Here are several to consider: * http://www.webarchive.org.uk/wayback/archive/*/http://www.aboutmayfair.co.uk/ * http://webarchive.loc.gov/lcwa0015/*/http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/adminlaw/ * http://www.padi.cat:8080/wayback/*/http://www.ajberga.cat/ * http://vefsafn.is/index.php?page=english Hope that helps :) Rob On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Nathan Tallman <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Lisa, > > Is your local web archive available online? I'd like to see a production > example of non-Internet Archive instance of Wayback/Open Wayback. > > Thanks, > Nathan > > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:17 PM, L Snider <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > Rob is right on! I included the wrong link, thanks for catching that... > > > > Cheers > > > > Lisa > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask] > > >wrote: > > > > > For what it's worth, the latest wayback code is: > > > > > > https://github.com/iipc/openwayback > > > > > > And being developed by the IIPC consortium, rather than just the > Internet > > > Archive alone. > > > It has many additional features, contributed by other members. > > > > > > It should be used in preference to the sourceforge version, IMO. > > > > > > Rob > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:00 AM, L Snider <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Kathryn, > > > > > > > > Right now the WARC format is considered the best preservation format > > for > > > > websites/social media, in terms of digital archives. It is our best > > guess > > > > right now. It will likely will be with us for a long time, because it > > has > > > > been adopted by most of the major players. > > > > > > > > The way I have seen WARCs served up is through Wayback, the manual > > > version > > > > of the Internet Archive's Wayback machine. > > > > http://archive-access.sourceforge.net/projects/wayback/index.html > > > > > > > > I have only used Heritrix and Wayback together, so I haven't played > > with > > > > Wayback and WARCs made another way. > > > > > > > > I would stick with WARC in terms of preservation, access is another > > > > story...that would depend on budget, time, etc. > > > > > > > > Hope that helps. > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > Lisa > > > > -- > > > > Lisa Snider > > > > Electronic Records Archivist > > > > Harry Ransom Center > > > > The University of Texas at Austin > > > > P.O. Box 7219 > > > > Austin, Texas 78713-7219 > > > > P: 512-232-4616 > > > > www.hrc.utexas.edu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Kathryn Frederick (Library) < > > > > [log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > I'm trying to develop a strategy for preserving issues our school's > > > > online > > > > > newspaper. Creating a WARC file of the content seems > straightforward, > > > but > > > > > how will that content fair long-term? Also, how is the WARC served > to > > > an > > > > > end-user? Is there some other method I should look at? > > > > > Thanks in advance for any advice! > > > > > Kathryn > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >