 |
 |
On 6/20/14, 1:49 PM, Joe Hourcle wrote: > > Now, it's possible that this whole "we don't need to bother with > http://" thing has spilled into the CMS building community, and > they're actively stripping it out. I actually had the editors of an ALA publication remove "http://" whenever it preceded "www" because they were convinced that you only needed "http://" when there was no "www" at the front of the domain name. I had to fight to get the "http://" put back in. (I believe the excuse was that it took up space.) > From their page, I think they're > using Drupal, but the horrible block of HTML that this was in is > blatantly MS Word's 'save as HTML' foulness: > > <h2><span lang="EN-US"><a name="HowItWorks_LinkedData"></a>Linked Data</span></h2> > <p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Linked data is part of the ISNI-IA’s strategy to make ISNIs freely available and widely diffused. Each assigned ISNI is accessible by a persistent URI in the form isni-url.oclc.nl/isni/0000000134596520 (for example) and soon also in the form isni.org/isni/0000000134596520. </span></p> > <p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Coming soon: ISNI core metadata in RDF triples. The RDF triples will be embedded in the public web pages and the format will be available via the persistent URI and the SRU search API.</span></p> > <p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p> Which is so foul that Dreamweaver has a "Clean up Word HTML" command in its menu. But you still end up with pretty bad HTML. kc > > -Joe > > > >>> On 20 June 2014 18:57, Eric Lease Morgan <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >>> >>>> On Jun 20, 2014, at 10:56 AM, Richard Wallis < >>>> [log in to unmask]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> authority control|simple identifier |Linked Data capability >>>>> +-----------------+------------------+--------------+ >>>>> VIAF | X | X | X | >>>>> +-----------------+------------------+--------------+ >>>>> ORCID | | X | | >>>>> +-----------------+------------------+--------------+ >>>>> ISNI | X | X | X | >>>>> +-----------------+------------------+--------------+ >>>> Increasingly I like linked data, and consequently, here is clarification >>>> and a question. ORCID does support RDF, but only barely. It can output >>>> FOAF-like data, but not bibliographic. Moreover, it is experimental, at >>>> best: >>>> >>>> curl -L -H 'accept: application/rdf+xml' >>>> http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9952-7800 >>>> >>>> In what ways does ISNI support linked data? >>>> >>>> --- >>>> Eric Morgan >>>> >>> >> -- >> Karen Coyle >> [log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net >> m: 1-510-435-8234 >> skype: kcoylenet -- Karen Coyle [log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet