 |
 |
More from Janifer…. Thanks Richard for forwarding. I don’t know how long my answer is allowed to be. Here are some extracts from a recent article (in publication): Meryl Streep has only one public identity that she uses for her creative works. VIAF includes Streep, Meryl (Mary Louise) as the name form on her birth certificate is Streep, Mary Louise. Her married name Gummer, Mary Louise, is mentioned in Wikipedia and could also be considered as a name variant. Changes in the preferred forenames and change of name due to marriage are not considered as constituting a change of identity as there is not necessarily a wish by the person to separate his or her creative output corresponding with a name change. Researchers, for example will mention the ensemble of their publications in their curriculum vitae where they have been published over a lifetime involving name changes. Alternative name forms that do not usually indicate a change in identity can take variant forms including names in different scripts or transliterated with different schemes, changes due to change of sex, marriage and deed poll. Kingsley Amis in the figure above is an example of an author writing under 3 different identities, writing as himself and writing under two different pseudonyms. His works attributed to each of the three different identities are clearly separated. In this case, the association of the pseudonyms with the real person is public but that is not always the case. For example, J.K. Rowling chose to create a pseudonym Robert Galbraith (35) so that she could write in a different genre and have her works in the new genre judged without any influence of the successful Harry Potter series. When the relationship between a pseudonym and a real person is or becomes public, the works tend to become associated with the real person as well as the pseudonym; for example they may be republished or released in collected works. One example is John Wyndham, the main pen name of John Wyndham Parkes Lucas Beynon Harris (10 July 1903 – 11 March 1969). Under an earlier pen name, John Beynon, he wrote*Secret People *but this is now published under John Wyndham. As a general rule, separate authority records should be made for each identity used as a public identity. This allows the history of works to be accurately traced, enabling catalogs to respond to questions such as “under which identity was the work conceived and first published?” The authority records related to each of the public identities should be linked where the relationship is public. Encyclopedias such as Wikipedia tend to have only one entry for a person, grouping all public identities. This entails the need for one-to-many relationships in linking especially from library authority records to encyclopedias. Best regards, Janifer On 19 June 2014 09:53, Owen Stephens <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > An aside but interesting to see how some of this identity stuff seems to > be playing out in the wild now. Google for Catherine Sefton: > > https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=catherine+sefton > > The Knowledge Graph displays information about Martin Waddell. Catherine > Sefton is a pseudonym of Martin Waddell. It is impossible to know, but the > most likely source of this knowledge is Wikipedia which includes the ISNI > for Catherine Sefton in the Wikipeda page for Martin Waddell ( > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Waddell) (although oddly not the ISNI > for Martin Waddell under his own name). > > Owen > > Owen Stephens > Owen Stephens Consulting > Web: http://www.ostephens.com > Email: [log in to unmask] > Telephone: 0121 288 6936 > > On 18 Jun 2014, at 23:28, Stuart Yeates <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > My reading of that suggests that > http://isni-url.oclc.nl/isni/0000000122816316 shouldn't have both "Bell, > Currer" and "Brontë, Charlotte", which it clearly does... > > > > Is this is a case of one of our sources of truth doesn't distinguish > betweens identities and entities and we're allowing it to pollute our data? > > > > If that source of truth is wikipedia, we can fix that. > > > > cheers > > stuart > > > > On 06/19/2014 12:11 AM, Richard Wallis wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Seeing this thread I checked with the ISNI team and got the following > >> answer from Janifer Gatenby who asked me to post it on her behalf: > >> > >> SNI identifies “public identities”. The scope as stated in the > standard > >> is > >> > >> > >> > >> “This International Standard specifies the International Standard name > >> identif*i*er (ISNI) for the identification of public identities of > parties; > >> that is, the identities used publicly by parties involved throughout the > >> media content industries in the creation, production, management, and > >> content distribution chains.” > >> > >> > >> > >> The relevant definitions are: > >> > >> > >> > >> *3.1* > >> > >> *party* > >> > >> natural person or legal person, whether or not incorporated, or a group > of > >> either > >> > >> *3.3* > >> > >> *public identity* > >> > >> Identity of a *party *(3.1) or a fictional character that is or was > >> presented to the public > >> > >> *3.4* > >> > >> *name* > >> > >> character string by which a *public identity *(3.3) is or was commonly > >> referenced > >> > >> > >> > >> A party may have multiple public identities and a public identity may > have > >> multiple names (e.g. pseudonyms) > >> > >> > >> > >> ISNI data is available as linked data. There are currently 8 million > ISNIs > >> assigned and 16 million links. > >> > >> > >> > >> Example: > >> > >> > >> > >> [image: <image001.png>] > >> > >> ~Richard. > >> > >> > >> On 16 June 2014 10:54, Ben Companjen <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Stuart, > >>> > >>> I don't have a copy of the official standard, but from the documents on > >>> the ISNI website I remember that there are name variations and 'public > >>> identities' (as the lemma on Wikipedia also uses). I'm not sure where > the > >>> borderline is or who decides when different names are different > identities. > >>> > >>> If it were up to me: pseudonyms are definitely different public > >>> identities, name changes after marriage probably not, name change after > >>> gender change could mean a different public identity. Different public > >>> identities get different ISNIs; the ISNI organisation says the ISNI > system > >>> can keep track of connected public identities. > >>> > >>> Discussions about name variations or aliases are not new, of course. I > >>> remember the discussions about 'aliases' vs 'Artist Name Variations' > that > >>> are/were happening on Discogs.com, e.g. 'is J Dilla an alias or a ANV > of > >>> Jay Dee?' It appears the users on Discogs finally went with aliases, > but > >>> VIAF put the names/identities together: http://viaf.org/viaf/32244000 > - > >>> and there is no ISNI (yet). > >>> > >>> It gets more confusing when you look at Washington Irving who had > several > >>> pseudonyms: they are just listed under one ISNI. Maybe because he is > dead, > >>> or because all other databases already know and connected the > pseudonyms > >>> to the birth name? (I just sent a comment asking about the record at > >>> http://isni.org/isni/0000000121370797 ) > >>> > >>> > >>> [Here goes the reference list…] > >>> > >>> Hope this helps :) > >>> > >>> Groeten van Ben > >>> > >>> On 15-06-14 23:11, "Stuart Yeates" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Could someone with access to the official text of ISO 27729:2012 tell > me > >>>> whether an ISNI is a name identifier or an entity identifier? That is, > >>>> if someone changes their name (adopts a pseudonym, changes their name > by > >>>> to marriage, transitions gender, etc), should they be assigned a new > >>>> identifier? > >>>> > >>>> If the answer is 'No' why is this called a 'name identifier'? > >>>> > >>>> Ideally someone with access to the official text would update the > >>>> article at > >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Standard_Name_Identifier > >>>> With a brief quote referenced to the standard with a page number. > >>>> > >>>> [The context of this is ORCID, which is being touted as an entity > >>>> identifier, while not being clear on whether it's a name or entity > >>>> identifier.] > >>>> > >>>> cheers > >>>> stuart > >>> > >> > >> > >> > -- Richard Wallis Founder, Data Liberate http://dataliberate.com Tel: +44 (0)7767 886 005 Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis Skype: richard.wallis1 Twitter: @rjw