 |
 |
Hi folks, In the interest of documentation and keeping similar threads together (and in the vein of Sean's comment about pull requests), I've started an issue at https://github.com/code4lib/antiharassment-policy/issues/46 for folks who want to hammer out the specifics there. In addition, if you want to make changes to the https://github.com/code4lib/antiharassment-policy docs and are not sure where to start (or don't want to create an account, or just not sure what the heck a 'pull request' means) give me a holler - it will at least give me a small break from dealing with ILS In Transit location drama at MPOW today. :c) Cheers, Becky On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Sean Hannan <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Pull requests welcome. > ________________________________________ > From: Code for Libraries [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Andreas > Orphanides [[log in to unmask]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 9:33 PM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Community anti-harassment policy > > In particular, we'd need to think about how to shape the sanctions section, > including things like: > > - What's an appropriate sanction in non-conference setting X? > - Who is empowered to enact sanctions? > - If a participant feels they have been harassed, who do they contact > and how? > - possibly other stuff? > > I think the conflict resolution part is in better shape, though it would > need a little cleanup for more universal (i.e., not conference-specific) > language. > > > On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Andreas Orphanides <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > > > My cursory web search came up with the one that was developed for the > most > > recent conference, but it's not clear to me what the breadth of the > > document is supposed to include. I think it was applied to the IRC > channel > > during the conference, but if it was written specifically as a conference > > policy, it's probably worth revisiting to ensure that it covers > everything > > needed community-wide outside of conference time as well. > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Coral Sheldon-Hess < > [log in to unmask] > > > wrote: > > > >> I was under the impression that we had a code of conduct/anti-harassment > >> policy in place for IRC and the mailing lists. Was this an incorrect > >> impression? > >> > >> I am definitely in favor of adopting one, if there isn't one in place! > >> > >> Logistically, Geek Feminism is also not a formal organization--they were > >> recently described as an anarchist collective--so I think we could > follow > >> their lead pretty easily. We could make a mail alias that goes to a > >> ROTATING team/committee (this is very important; people burn out, > dealing > >> with these things for too long), for reporting purposes. IRC aliases > are a > >> thing, too, right? > >> > >> -coral > >> > > > > >