Now now. It's perfectly acceptable to bash Drupal. Remember what's written on the jar: "choosy moms don't choose Drupal." Just trolling a little, Michael | @gollydamn -----Original Message----- From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Alex Armstrong Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 4:09 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference site backend Cary, I sense I have upset you. I don't think I bashed or promoted anything, but I could mistaken. In any case, I certainly I did not mean to upset you and I'm really sorry about that. Let me go back to the beginning: I am fact-gathering CMSs and plugins for building a conference and community site (two different projects, happening in that order) for a consortium. Any and all suggestions are very welcome. Alex On 10/16/2014 10:17 PM, Cary Gordon wrote: > It appears that you are bashing Drupal because of your experience with > an old version, and that you want to promote CUNY's WordPress Commons > in a Box. You are drawing a conclusion — perhaps that Wordpress is > "better" — although I am not sure how you get there. > > I make a fair chunk of my living working on Drupal projects in the > library/academic/non-profit space, and I am deeply involved with the > Drupal project, but I do not feel that WordPress is "the competition". > If I bid Drupal for a CMS and lose to Wordpress or another FOSS CMS, I > see that as a win. As a true believer in free and open-source > software, I see the competition as the expensive closed source, lock-in systems. > > I prefer Drupal to WordPress, because my company builds complex > systems that often integrate with external services, and Drupal > provides a much more robust set of tools for to build on. If someone > else has already built a great system that suits your purpose in > WordPress, then the toolset is not an issue. You can certainly build great tools in WordPress. > > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Alex Armstrong <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > >> Thanks Mark. Both of these look promising. >> >> Cary, I wasn't trying to tar COD. (That's a nice verb right there :) >> My comment about the table of unfair feature comparison was about >> this design pattern in general. I probably should have kept my >> opinions to myself in this context. >> >> I am little biased against Drupal, which has to do with my own >> background: I've never used anything later than Drupal 6! >> >> We're also looking into platforms for building academic communities >> or communities in higher ed contexts. The bigwig in this area is >> CUNY's Commons in a Box, which is WordPress-powered. >> >> I'm not aware of something as full-featured and actively-maintained, >> whether open source or not -- but please correct me if I'm wrong. >> Hence my gentle instistence on WordPress. >> >> (I was planning to ask about the academic communities as a seperate >> question, which I may do anyway, depending on who bites in this >> thread and as I wrap up my own research.) >> >> Alex >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Cary Gordon <[log in to unmask]> >> wrote: >>> There is also Able Organizer, a new CRM distribution for Drupal that >>> has >> events in its protfolio. I have not had much opportunity to work with >> it, yet. https://www.drupal.org/project/ableorganizer >>> Drupal COD is well established. I wouldn't tar COD for some external BS. >> That makes no sense. We use it for out local Drupal events. >>> On Oct 15, 2014, at 9:06 AM, Alex Armstrong <[log in to unmask]> >> wrote: >>>> Thanks for pitching in. COD looks good. >>>> >>>> On their site (http://usecod.com) I found the obligatory table of >> unfair feature comparisons. One of these is to an out-of-date >> WordPress plugin. >>>> Any WP suggestions? >>>> >>>> ('m not partial, but as of earlier today it looks like I might be >>>> using >> it for other, but affiliated reasons.) >>>> Alex >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 10/15/2014 05:34 PM, Clapp, Sharon B. (Library) wrote: >>>>> Someone has mentioned Drupal's Conference Organizing Distribution, >> right?https://www.drupal.org/project/cod >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On >>>>> Behalf >> Of Alex Armstrong >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 5:36 AM >>>>> To:[log in to unmask] >>>>> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference site backend >>>>> >>>>> Let me try and ask this again, with less ambiguity: >>>>> >>>>> What built-in CMS functionality or plugin have you used to assist >>>>> you >> in managing a conference schedule and registration? >>>>> Among other things, I'm in the market for a new CMS. So rather >>>>> than >> the specialized tool that Francis suggested, I'm looking for a >> multi-purpose platform or a platform I can wrangle to serve multiple >> purposes. >>>>> P.S. Confusingly, I switched my CODE4LIB subscription to a >>>>> different >> email. >>>>> Alex >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On October 10, 2014 4:23:57 PM EEST, Francis >>>>> Kayiwa<[log in to unmask]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> On 10/10/2014 09:13 AM, Alex Armstrong wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi list, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Not exactly related to libraries, but: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm putting together a site for the annual conference of a >>>>>>> library consortium. Last year we had paired a static site with >>>>>>> an event service >>>>>>> (Sched) to manage the schedule and provide workshop sign ups. >>>>>>> This time we'd like to move everything under one umbrella. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Any recommendations for a conference backend? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm looking for an open source solution I can deploy on a >>>>>>> shared hosting plan. I'm not picky about the CMS. The current >>>>>>> iteration is put together locally using a static site >>>>>>> generator, so I can switch >> to whatever. >>>>>> Give Open Conference a looksie >>>>>> >>>>>> https://pkp.sfu.ca/ocs/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> ./fxk >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> -- >>>> Alex > > -- Alex