 |
 |
If the site was not patched within a few hours of the announcement, the odds are that you will need to rebuild it from a backup made before October 15th. It is very difficult to detect a successful exploit, or predict if a back-door will be used. I suggest that your first move should be to contact Bluehost, as they may have done the patch for you. If not, please read the rest of this thread. If you have more questions or need help, let us know here. I will attempt to address any issue that is explored in this forum. Cary > On Nov 11, 2014, at 8:40 PM, Heidi P Frank <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > Hi, > A colleague and I volunteer for an organization to maintain their website, > which is a Drupal site hosted on Bluehost, however, neither of us are very > experienced with Drupal. So we've been trying to figure out what we need > to do to prevent the site from being affected by this vulnerability issue, > and have read a lot of the documentation and tried following the > instructions to upgrade, etc. but are still having trouble. > > If there is anyone on this list who would be willing to speak with us and > answer some questions about how we need to proceed, please contact me off > list. Any guidance will be much appreciated with numerous Thank You's! > (i.e., we need some pro bono assistance :) > > cheers, > Heidi > > Heidi Frank > Electronic Resources & Special Formats Cataloger > New York University Libraries > Knowledge Access & Resources Management Services > 20 Cooper Square, 3rd Floor > New York, NY 10003 > 212-998-2499 (office) > 212-995-4366 (fax) > [log in to unmask] > Skype: hfrank71 > > On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Cary Gordon <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> If you can migrate to a maintained service, you could use feeds or migrate >> to move your content. You could also take that approach on your own >> new site. Obviously, none of your entities — nodes, menus, users, blocks, >> taxonomies, etc. — should contain executable code. >> >> I suggest that you do not migrate users or menus, unless you have the >> ability to validate your data. >> >> I love the internets, but I have learned that nobody should be >> running public facing services — open-source or other — unless they are >> prepared to maintain them, including managing a disaster recovery plan and >> vigilantly monitoring and acting on security notices. If this is not >> doable, use a service provider to manage it. The days of running services >> from a computer under a desk are gone. >> >> Cary >> >> On Sunday, November 2, 2014, Hickner, Andrew <[log in to unmask]> >> wrote: >> >>> I'd be curious to hear how others are proceeding. We had already planned >>> to migrate our D7 sites to a centralized Drupal instance offered here at >>> Yale and this has just accelerated the timetable. I imagine there are a >>> lot of libraries running Drupal though who don't have this kind of option >>> and might not have pre-October 15 backups to revert to (we don't!) >>> >>> >>> >>> Andy Hickner >>> Web Services Librarian >>> Yale University >>> Cushing/Whitney Medical Library >>> http://library.medicine.yale.edu/ >>> >>> ________________________________________ >>> From: Code for Libraries [[log in to unmask] <javascript:;>] on >>> behalf of Lin, Kun [[log in to unmask] <javascript:;>] >>> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 2:10 PM >>> To: [log in to unmask] <javascript:;> >>> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Terrible Drupal vulnerability >>> >>> I think so. However, Cloudflare in their blog post claim they have >> develop >>> a way to block the attack immediately when the vulnerability was >> announced. >>> Whether or not they know the exploit ahead of time or not, it would be >> good >>> to know someone is watching out for you for $20 a month. And you will be >>> mad if you took Oct 15th off without it. I just check, I patched my >>> instance on Oct 16th. Not sure what's going to happened. >>> >>> Kun >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask] >> <javascript:;>] >>> On Behalf Of Cary Gordon >>> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 1:44 PM >>> To: [log in to unmask] <javascript:;> >>> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Terrible Drupal vulnerability >>> >>> The vulnerability was discovered in the course of an audit by >> SektionEins, >>> a German security firm, and immediately reported to the Drupal Security >>> Team. Because this was a pretty obscure vulnerability with no reported >>> exploits, the team decided to wait until the first scheduled release date >>> after DrupalCon Amsterdam to put out the notice and patch. Obviously, >> they >>> knew that once word of the vulnerability was announced, there would >>> immediately be a wave of exploits, so they imposed a blackout on any >>> mention of it before October 15th. I think that they stuck to their word. >>> >>> Of course, attacks started a few hours after the announcement. >>> >>> Cary >>> >>>> On Oct 31, 2014, at 9:38 AM, Joe Hourcle < >> [log in to unmask] >>> <javascript:;>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Oct 31, 2014, at 11:46 AM, Lin, Kun wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Cary, >>>>> >>>>> I don't know from whom. But for the heartbeat vulnerability earlier >>> this year, they as well as some other big providers like Google and >> Amazon >>> were notified and patched before it was announced. >>>> >>>> If they have an employee who contributes to the project, it's possible >>>> that this was discussed on development lists before it was sent down >>>> to user level mailing lists. >>>> >>>> Odds are, there's also some network of people who are willing to give >>>> things a cursory review / beta test in a more controlled manner before >>>> they're officially released (and might break thousands of websites). >>>> It would make sense that companies who derive a good deal of their >>>> profits in supporting software would participate in those programs, as >>> well. >>>> >>>> I could see categorizing either of those as 'ahead of the *general* >>>> public', which was Kun's assertion. >>>> >>>> -Joe >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask] >>> <javascript:;>] On Behalf >>>>> Of Cary Gordon >>>>> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 11:10 AM >>>>> To: [log in to unmask] <javascript:;> >>>>> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Terrible Drupal vulnerability >>>>> >>>>> How do they receive vulnerability report ahead of general public? From >>> whom? >>>>> >>>>> Cary >>>>> >>>>> On Friday, October 31, 2014, Lin, Kun <[log in to unmask] <javascript:;>> >>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> If you are using drupal as main website, consider using Cloudflare >> Pro. >>>>>> It's just $20 a month and worth it. They'll help block most attacks. >>>>>> And they usually receive vulnerability report ahead of general >> public. >>>>>> >>>>>> Kun >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask] >>> <javascript:;> >>>>>> <javascript:;>] On Behalf Of Cary Gordon >>>>>> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 9:59 AM >>>>>> To: [log in to unmask] <javascript:;> <javascript:;> >>>>>> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Terrible Drupal vulnerability >>>>>> >>>>>> This is what I posted to the Drupal4Lib list: >>>>>> >>>>>> -------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>> By now, you should have seen https://www.drupal.org/PSA-2014-003 and >>>>>> heard about the "Drupageddon" exploits. and you may be wondering if >>>>>> you were vulnerable or iff you were hit by this, how you can tell >>>>>> and what you should do. Drupageddon affects Drupal 7, Drupal 8 and, >>>>>> if you use the DBTNG module, Drupal 6. >>>>>> >>>>>> The general recommendation is that if you do not know or are unsure >>>>>> of your server's security and you did not either update to Drupal >>>>>> 7.32 or apply the patch within a few hours of the notice, you should >>>>>> assume that your site (and server) was hacked and you should restore >>>>>> everything to a backup from before October 15th or earlier. If your >>>>>> manage your server and you have any doubts about your file security, >>>>>> you should restore that to a pre 10/15 image, as well or do a >>> reinstall of your server software. >>>>>> >>>>>> I know this sounds drastic, and I know that not everyone will do >> that. >>>>>> There are some tests you can run on your server, but they can only >>>>>> verify the hacks that have been identified. >>>>>> >>>>>> At MPOW, we enforce file security on our production servers. Our >>>>>> deployments are scripted in our continuous integration system, and >>>>>> only that system can write files outside of the temporal file >>> directory (e.g. >>>>>> /sites/site-name/files). We also forbid executables in the temporal >>>>>> file system. This prevents many exploits related to this issue. >>>>>> >>>>>> Of course, the attack itself is on the database, so even if the file >>>>>> system is not compromised, the attacker could, for example, get >>>>>> admin access to the site by creating an account, making it an admin, >>>>>> and sending themselves a password. While they need a valid email >>>>>> address to set the password, they would likely change that as soon as >>> they were in. >>>>>> >>>>>> Some resources: >>>>>> https://www.drupal.org/PSA-2014-003 >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.acquia.com/blog/learning-hackers-week-after-drupal-sql-i >>>>>> nj >>>>>> ection-announcement >>>>>> >>>>>> http://drupal.stackexchange.com/questions/133996/drupal-sa-core-2014 >>>>>> -0 05-how-to-tell-if-my-server-sites-were-compromised >>>>>> >>>>>> I won't attempt to outline every audit technique here, but if you >>>>>> have any questions, please ask them. >>>>>> >>>>>> The takeaway from this incident, is that while Drupal has a great >>>>>> security team and community, it is incumbent upon site owners and >>>>>> admins to pay attention. Most Drupal security issues are only >>>>>> exploitable by privileged users, and admins need to be careful and >>>>>> read every security notice. If a vulnerability is publicly >>> exploitable, you must take action immediately. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>> Cary >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Dan Scott <[log in to unmask] >>> <javascript:;> >>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Via lwn.net, I came across https://www.drupal.org/PSA-2014-003 and >>>>>>> my heart >>>>>>> sank: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> """ >>>>>>> Automated attacks began compromising Drupal 7 websites that were >>>>>>> not patched or updated to Drupal 7.32 within hours of the >>>>>>> announcement of >>>>>>> SA-CORE-2014-005 >>>>>>> - <https://www.drupal.org/SA-CORE-2014-005>Drupal >>>>>>> <https://www.drupal.org/SA-CORE-2014-005> core - SQL injection >>>>>>> <https://www.drupal.org/SA-CORE-2014-005>. You should proceed under >>>>>>> the assumption that every Drupal 7 website was compromised unless >>>>>>> updated or patched before Oct 15th, 11pm UTC, that is 7 hours after >>>>>>> the >>>>>> announcement. >>>>>>> """ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That's about as bad as it gets, folks. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Cary Gordon >>>>>> The Cherry Hill Company >>>>>> http://chillco.com >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Cary Gordon >>>>> The Cherry Hill Company >>>>> http://chillco.com >>> >> >> >> -- >> Cary Gordon >> The Cherry Hill Company >> http://chillco.com >>