 |
 |
+1 to Sean's questions. I've considered implementing a shelf browse system myself, but I am wary. It's a huge amount of work, and I have no idea who it will benefit or how much. It's one of those things that certainly seems cool to me, but unfortunately I am not the target audience of our website (but it would be much easier if I were). Any usage stats would be greatly appreciated. Josh Welker -----Original Message----- From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Sean Hannan Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 8:29 AM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] state of the art in virtual shelf browse? For those investigating a shelf browse (and for those that have implemented one), I have a few questions: Where is the feature demand originating? Staff? Faculty? Students? Grad students? Undergrad students? (Not to exclude publics or special libraries, but this seems to be an academic catalog feature, when it shows up.) What is the level of familiarity with library/library services/library systems for those that request this feature? Is implementing shelf browse an attempt to work around some other catalog deficiency (e.g. weak subject cataloging)? Does the corpus have the cataloging data to support such a feature? (A lot of ebook packages do not have call numbers, for example.) What零 the percentage? Is that reasonable? How do you plan on tracking use of the feature? What would you consider to be a success rate? 20% of sessions? 5%? 1%? At what point do you sunset the feature? Expand upon it? How long will the feature take to implement? How many staff will be involved? What is the ROI? Will all of your users understand the visual implementation on the page? How do you plan on testing it? Does the shelf metaphor still hold for your users? How do you know? -Sean On 1/28/15, 8:30 AM, "Darylyne Provost" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >We're interested in implementing a virtual browse feature as well, so I >was glad to find this post. > >Since we have a shared catalog and the feature is currently under >discussion by our partner institutions, we're also considering >implementing it for our installation of Summon first. I've seen U of >Huddersfield, but am wondering if there are additional examples? > >Thanks, > >Darylyne > >************************************** >Darylyne Provost >Assistant Director for Systems, Web, & Emerging Technologies Colby >College >207.859.5117 >[log in to unmask] > >On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Gerritsma, Wouter ><[log in to unmask]> >wrote: > >> Beautiful to see that the meticulously recorded book height is put >> into use. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf >> Of Harper, Cynthia >> Sent: dinsdag 27 januari 2015 21:27 >> To: [log in to unmask] >> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] state of the art in virtual shelf browse? >> >> What testimony to what a difference presentation can make! So much >>better than basically the same functionality, but in a text list, as >>shown in our old III Webpac. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf >> Of Cole Hudson >> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 9:57 AM >> To: [log in to unmask] >> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] state of the art in virtual shelf browse? >> >> Hi Jenn, >> >> Just to add one example more to the mix, we've built a shelf browser >>based on Harvard's Stackview/Stacklife project--adding to it a z39.50 >>connector and organizing results by call number. This search works >>across all of holdings, regardless of the books' locations. (Click >>the link, then under the Books and Media box, click See on Shelf to >>look at our shelf >>browser.) >> >> http://library.wayne.edu/quicksearch/#q=the%20hobbit >> >> Also, our code is on Github: https://github.com/WSULib/SVCatConnector >> >> Cole >>