Thank you so much for all the replies, these are all very helpful! When building the prototype for this particular page listing digitized collections, I had put Digital Collections as the header out of habit essentially because I know that's what "we" call them. The group working on the page is going to do some more thinking about the labeling. (To give some more info on what we were trying to do: this is a list of collection-level records for collections Cornell has digitized. Cataloged digitized collections can definitely be found along with everything else in the catalog. The purpose of the list is to "highlight" these collections and to perhaps make them easier to find. We don't have a "digital collection" facet in our Blacklight catalog yet, though we like how Stanford has set theirs up. These collections can be cataloged as a variety of different formats as well - databases, websites, books, etc. so there really isn't an obvious way to look at or narrow your search to them in the catalog. It might be that the page won't get a lot of use because the collections can be discovered in the catalog, but it will be available if someone would like to see a list of such things.) On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 7:57 AM, McDonald, Stephen <[log in to unmask] > wrote: > My question would be, why are you trying to keep them separate? Why not > group them all together? People don't want to have to look all over the > place to find what they want. They want it all in one place. >