 |
 |
"code4lib: definitely not coders and mostly libraries, kinda!" On Tue, Sep 1, 2015, 07:43 Edward Iglesias <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > ++1 I know many librarians who occasionally code as part of their jobs but > would not consider themselves "coders". I like Interface Hacker but what > do I know? > > Edward Iglesias > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Matt Sherman <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > > > As one who doesn't spend their day neck deep in compilers I will also > vote > > that this is a good idea. > > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 10:24 AM, David Mayo <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > > > ++ as well from me. > > > > > > On an unrelated note: as long as someone's in there changing stuff, > > > changing the favicon away from the default Drupal one would be nice. > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Eric Lease Morgan <[log in to unmask]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > On Sep 1, 2015, at 9:42 AM, Eric Hellman <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > As someone who feels that Code4Lib should welcome people who don't > > > > particularly identify as "coders", I would welcome a return to the > > > previous > > > > title attribute. > > > > > > > > 1++ because I believe it is more about libraries than it is about > > code. > > > > —ELM > > > > > > > > > >