 |
 |
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Becky Yoose <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Apologies for the short reply with my manager's hat firmly in place - > transparency is good, but there are times when a particular process or > discussion should not be public. Given the sensitive nature of some of the > feedback that might be presented about particular individuals, transparency > would not be a good fit for the feedback process. > For clarity, am I correct in understanding we are collecting feedback only on those volunteering to become duty officers, and not on those who compile/manage harassment information nor on those responsible for determining what actions to take in response to incidents of harassment? kyle