Well, this is a side project with just 2 of us working on it, and I have the tech skills so it is more of what I need to learn to make it work. On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Ethan Gruber <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > There are countless ways to approach the problem, but I suggest beginning > with tools that are within the area of expertise of your staff. Mapping > disparate structured formats into a single Solr instance for fast search > and retrieval is one possibility. > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Matt Sherman <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I am looking to pick the group brain as to what might be the most useful > > database software for a digital project I am collaborating on. We are > > working on converting an annotated bibliography to a searchable database. > > While I have the data in a few structured formats, we need to figure out > > now what to actually put it in so that it can be queried. My default > line > > of thinking is to try a MySQL since it is free and used ubiquitously > > online, but I wanted to see if there were any other database or software > > systems that we should also consider before investing a lot of time in > one > > approach. Any advice and suggestions would be appreciated. > > > > Matt Sherman > > >