Hi Mariella, We do not have a specific get-together/meeting scheduled for the Standards Working group that I know of, but we do have a lunch/work session scheduled on Thursday Nov 10th for the Fixity Discussion which our group is involved in. https://www.conftool.pro/dlf2016/index.php?page=browseSessions&presentations=show&form_tracks=2 [image: Inline image 1] - Carol On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Soprano, Maria (Mariella) < [log in to unmask]> wrote: > Hi, > > So sorry to have missed this call. I will be attending the Digital > preservation 2016 meeting in November. Will our group have a > get-together/meeting there? > > Mariella > > Mariella Soprano | Senior Archivist for Collection Management | > Caltech Archives & Special Collections | Mail Code B215A-74 | > Pasadena CA 91125 | Phone 626.395.2501 | Fax 626.395.4073 | > [log in to unmask] | Caltech | > > > -----Original Message----- > From: The NDSA Standards Working Group list [mailto:[log in to unmask] > CLIR.ORG] On Behalf Of Michelle A. Paolillo > Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 8:29 AM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: [NDSA-STANDARDS] 9/19 NDSA S&P Agenda > > Hi, > I am also unable to make this meeting, due to a conflict. Apologies. > Michelle > > -----Original Message----- > From: The NDSA Standards Working Group list [mailto:[log in to unmask] > CLIR.ORG] On Behalf Of Goethals, Andrea > Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 10:01 AM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: [NDSA-STANDARDS] 9/19 NDSA S&P Agenda > > Hi All, > > Sorry to say I’ll have to miss this call. I’m at the LC Storage meeting, > which, only a few presentations in, is already very interesting. > > Andrea > > On 9/19/16, 9:47 AM, "The NDSA Standards Working Group list on behalf of > Collie, Aaron" <[log in to unmask] on behalf of > [log in to unmask]> wrote: > > Hi All, > > We are scheduled for a 1pm call today (eastern). The only agenda item > I have is from Andrea, which you were all copied on, I believe. I think > this topic is a fantastic follow up discussion to our last call. What could > we do to help? > > If anyone has any other topics either send them me or to the list, > otherwise bring them up during our call — there should be plenty of time > for discussion today. In summary, let’s convene at 1pm for a discussion on > responding to the OAIS call for review. > > Call Info: > > To join the call, just go to www.uberconference.com/clir-dlf in your > browser, or call 202-750-4186 by phone-- no PIN needed. > > Best, > > Aaron > > > From: The NDSA Standards Working Group list < > [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> on > behalf of "Goethals, Andrea" <[log in to unmask]<mailto: > [log in to unmask]>> > Reply-To: The NDSA Standards Working Group list < > [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> > Date: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 at 1:34 PM > To: "[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask] > CLIR.ORG>" <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask] > CLIR.ORG>> > Subject: [NDSA-STANDARDS] FW: [IIPC - PWG] OAIS review announcement > > Hello, > > This announcement is very relevant to our last S&P call. If anyone in > the group has ideas on how the S&P WG could contribute to this OAIS review, > please reply to this list. I would like to contribute to this review in > some way. > > Thanks, > Andrea > > From: <[log in to unmask]<mailto:list- > [log in to unmask]>> on behalf of Mike Kearney < > [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> > Reply-To: "[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>" > <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> > Date: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 at 1:11 PM > To: "[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>" <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>, " > [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>" < > [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> > Subject: [IIPC - PWG] OAIS review announcement > > I’m passing along this information on the ongoing OAIS review to the > IIPC in general and the PWG in particular. > > The CCSDS Data Archive Ingest working group is starting the 5-year > review of the OAIS standard. In a nutshell, they are collecting comments > now (as described below), and hope to have some good comments to discuss at > their working group meeting in Rome in October, hence their request to have > initial comments before October 7. However, the review will continue past > that meeting, and comments will be accepted until the end of this year. > > Please forward this to any interested parties that may be interested > in participating in this CCSDS and ISO review. Note that this is already > being broadly distributed to the digital preservation organizations that > the CCSDS DAI WG is aware of. > > -=- Mike > > Mike Kearney > Huntsville, Alabama, USA > > ******************************** > OAIS Overview > The Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS)< > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__public.ccsds.org_ > publications_archive_650x0m2.pdf&d=CwMFAg&c=WO-RGvefibhHBZq3fL85hQ&r= > LPdSCPFhvO8mDmjvl_-JlDGPt3orxJrHLmT4bld8Hro&m=K_ > 5vsMPPAzLlLAQ5nD2pVKqPAs8TPG2QcB7C69Q1FG0&s=QTYirJnEFf8UXoOqCYicBPldNuPvD3 > vggMMiPlqf5sQ&e=> was developed for use in facilitating a broad, > discipline independent, consensus on the requirements for an archive or > repository to provide long-term, preservation of digital information. It > was also intended to support the development of additional digital > preservation standards. > An OAIS is an archive consisting of an organization of people and > systems that has accepted the responsibility to preserve information and > make it available to a Designated Community. The standard defines a set of > responsibilities that an OAIS archive must fulfil and this allows an OAIS > archive to be distinguished from other uses of the term archive. > Since its adoption as both a Consultative Committee for Space Data > Systems (CCSDS) and an ISO standard, the OAIS Reference Model has been > welcomed and widely adopted by virtually all types of digital preservation > communities. Most modern digital preservation initiatives reference the > OAIS Reference Model standard. It has also been widely used by > organizations to inform their implementations of new or upgraded > preservation systems. > Five Year Review > In compliance with ISO and CCSDS procedures, a standard must be > reviewed every five years and a determination made to reaffirm, modify, or > withdraw the existing standard. The Reference Model for an Open Archival > Information System (OAIS) standard was approved as CCSDS 650.0-B-1 in > January 2002 and was approved as ISO standard 14721 in 2003. A comment > period for that first issue of the OAIS standard was held at the end of > 2006. Based on the comments received, CCSDS began work on a new issue of > OAIS. Issue 2 of OAIS, CCSDS 650.0-M-2, was published in June 2012 and was > approved as an update to ISO 14721 in August 2012. > The Issue 2 updates include clarifications to many concepts, in > particular Authenticity with the concept of Transformational Information > Property introduced; corrections and improvements in diagrams; addition of > Access Rights Information to Preservation Description Information. With > those updates the OAIS standard continues to garner widespread and growing > recognition and acceptance in the digital preservation communities. > While the current issue of the standard can be reaffirmed given its > wide usage, it may also be appropriate to begin another revision process. > As with the previous update, our view is that any revision must remain > backward compatible with regard to major terminology and concepts. Further, > we do not plan to expand the general level of detail nor will the standard > be changed from a reference model to an implementation design. Archive > implementation standards or implementation profiles or detailed archival > process standards or protocols should be addressed but they would become > separate standards and would be developed through separate CCSDS projects. > A particular interest for the current OAIS update is to reduce ambiguities > and to fill in any missing or weak concepts and to add useful terminology. > To this end, a comment period has been established. > Comment Process > We are soliciting recommendations for updates that will reduce > ambiguities or improve missing or weak concepts. We also want to know if > you prefer that no changes be made. Please categorize your comments for > changes under one of the following: > · Editorial > · Corrections to matters of fact > · Updates to add useful terminology > · Updates needed for clarification > · Updates to add missing concepts or strengthen weak concepts > · Identification of any outdated material > · Recommended change for other considerations > In addition, any backward compatibility issues should be indicated. > Please be as specific as possible with your suggestions. If possible, > comments should be received by 7 October, 2016, but additional comments > will be accepted up to 31st December 2016. > Comments may be submitted via: http://review.oais.info<https: > //urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__review.oais. > info&d=CwMFAg&c=WO-RGvefibhHBZq3fL85hQ&r=LPdSCPFhvO8mDmjvl_- > JlDGPt3orxJrHLmT4bld8Hro&m=K_5vsMPPAzLlLAQ5nD2pVKqPAs8TPG2Q > cB7C69Q1FG0&s=DbCF765gz1M55mq_Od2-2MLg6qul2bXqJRf8kHfJKk4&e=> > Before submitting comments, please review the guidelines on the review > page, such as checking to see if your comment has already been made. > Note that CCSDS 652.0-B-1 – Audit and Certification of Trustworthy > Digital Repositories. Magenta Book. Issue 1. September 2011< > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__public.ccsds.org_ > publications_archive_652x0m1.pdf&d=CwMFAg&c=WO-RGvefibhHBZq3fL85hQ&r= > LPdSCPFhvO8mDmjvl_-JlDGPt3orxJrHLmT4bld8Hro&m=K_ > 5vsMPPAzLlLAQ5nD2pVKqPAs8TPG2QcB7C69Q1FG0&s=RV4GocHFEs4TwUSx8h9tiTkG- > VvslJdo-3Zj2J-GR-4&e=>, (ISO 16363:2012) a follow-on standard closely > related to the OAIS standard, is also due for its five-year review. Please > follow the same procedure to provide comments for that standard submitting > those comments to http://review.oais.info<https: > //urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__review.oais. > info&d=CwMFAg&c=WO-RGvefibhHBZq3fL85hQ&r=LPdSCPFhvO8mDmjvl_- > JlDGPt3orxJrHLmT4bld8Hro&m=K_5vsMPPAzLlLAQ5nD2pVKqPAs8TPG2Q > cB7C69Q1FG0&s=DbCF765gz1M55mq_Od2-2MLg6qul2bXqJRf8kHfJKk4&e=>. Please > ensure you select the correct product (document) on the review page when > providing your comments. > If you have problems using the web form, then please email > [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> with the Subject: > beginning with “OAIS/ISO16363 review”. > If you wish to participate in the discussions of the suggested changes > to OAIS and ISO 16363, please join the MOIMS_DAI mailing list at > https://mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/moims-dai< > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https- > 3A__mailman.ccsds.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_moims- > 2Ddai&d=CwMFAg&c=WO-RGvefibhHBZq3fL85hQ&r=LPdSCPFhvO8mDmjvl_- > JlDGPt3orxJrHLmT4bld8Hro&m=K_5vsMPPAzLlLAQ5nD2pVKqPAs8TPG2QcB7C69Q1FG0&s= > jZJXReuWYqkMyRvNeEhVHRvM0IPLBjDJlEYCweiEAdw&e=>. This mailing list will > be used to co-ordinate discussions and meetings. > > > -- Carol Kussmann Digital Preservation Analyst Digital Preservation and Repository Technologies | University of Minnesota Libraries 499 Wilson Library, 309 19th Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55455 Tel: 612.626.0099 Email: [log in to unmask]