PGP has a dreadful reputation for usability, be prepared for a significant support burden if you take that route. You could always try omitting details from the email but providing a link: "You have 4 books due tomorrow, click here and login to see the details" kind of thing. That in conjunction with a local techie checking your email sending settings. cheers stuart -- ...let us be heard from red core to black sky On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Jim Hart <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Depending on the client, the default security may be something other than > PGP. Thunderbird comes to mind. I think it uses SSL. Gmail uses TLS. Yahoo! > uses DKIM. Not that PGP can't be added as a plug-in or extension, sometimes > (e.g. Thunderbird), but that may be beyond the capability (and willingness) > of many people. > > I'd love to encrypt some of my email, but haven't been able to get > agreement from even my most savvy acquaintances. > > Let us know how it goes if you decide to tackle it. > > > James A. (Jim) Hart > Board of Trustees > Albert Church Brown Memorial Library > China Village, Maine, USA > > > > On 10/28/2016 06:10 PM, Bigwood, David wrote: > >> I've been thinking about privacy lately. It seems to me much more email >> should be encrypted. Many communications from the library might be personal >> and potentially damaging. Email from the library showing overdues, or holds >> might be sensitive. Would it be possible for our email systems to ask for a >> public PGP key along with email and then use that whenever sending out >> notices? Should my hospital, insurance company, bank, and so on be doing >> the same? Just asking, maybe we could take the lead on privacy in this area. >> >> David Bigwood >> [log in to unmask] >> Public PGP Key: http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup? >> op=vindex&search=0x52B602E601695F10 >> Lunar and Planetary institute >> >>