 |
 |
Hi Chris, I would be interested in the feedback you get as well. We did this investigation ourselves last year came to the conclusion that nothing is as good as our Bookeye 2 scanners with KIC software. We think even the newer model, the Bookeye 4 (we own one), is not as good. So if you hear anything different, I would love to be able to share that with my library. Thanks very much, Lisa Lisa Genoese Systems Librarian Arthur W. Diamond Law Library Columbia University 435 West 116th Street New York, NY 10027 (212) 851-9347 [log in to unmask] On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Christopher H Day <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Forgive a second "question/survey" post in a single day, but I'm also > looking for feedback on any self-service book scanners you may have in your > library. > > > We currently use a 5-yr-old KIC BookEye Scanner as a public book scanner > for our patrons. Popular features include: touch-screen editing of > images/pages; output in multiple formats; entirely self-service (at least > in theory); and free to end users. > > > > We are starting to investigate replacements, and are hoping to ask a few > questions of anyone who is providing similar book scanning equipment for > their patrons. Specifically, we're interested in information about user > satisfaction, maintenance and support issues, and quality of scans. If you > have some time for a few brief questions by email please contact me off > list. > > > > Thanks very much for your time. > > Chris > > -- > > > *Christopher Day *Digital Resources Librarian > MacLean Visual Resources Center > > John M. Flaxman Library | The School of the Art Institute of Chicago > 37 South Wabash, 6th FL, Chicago, IL 60603 > 312.899.5101 | [log in to unmask] > http://libraryguides.saic.edu/vrc | https://digital-libraries.saic.edu > > > -- > BEGIN-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Teach Email if this mail (ID 01RPU03Dy) is spam: > Spam: https://antispam.law.columbia.edu/canit/b.php?i=01RPU03Dy&m= > 72bb651e4b44&t=20161005&c=s > Not spam: https://antispam.law.columbia.edu/canit/b.php?i=01RPU03Dy&m= > 72bb651e4b44&t=20161005&c=n > Forget vote: https://antispam.law.columbia.edu/canit/b.php?i=01RPU03Dy&m= > 72bb651e4b44&t=20161005&c=f > ------------------------------------------------------ > END-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS > >