 |
 |
Hi Paul, We haven't chosen to leave III-Sierra, just exploring options. Cost is the main factor. Missouri public universities just got hit with massive budget cuts plus a big drop in international enrollment. The cost for Sierra keeps rising. Plus, Sierra seems heavily weighed down by legacy systems that prevent it from being able to do things newer systems can do. We are looking at Alma and WMS specifically because they are entirely cloud-based and redesigned from the ground up for modern workflows involving e-resources, knowledgebases, discovery, etc. From what I can tell, all the other products are a hodge-podge of traditional ILS systems plus add-ons for the e-resources stuff. (I think Sirsi Dynex is moving in the same direction as Alma and WMS but hasn't finished their next-gen product quite yet.) Being able to do everything in one system saves costs both in terms of subscriptions and labor. Joshua Welker Information Technology Librarian James C. Kirkpatrick Library University of Central Missouri Warrensburg, MO 64093 JCKL 2260 660.543.8022 On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Paul Poulain <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Hi Josh, > > Ccan you share with us what made you chose to leave III-Sierra ? Why are > you limiting your options to Alma or WMS ? > > > > Le 28/04/2017 à 15:50, Josh Welker a écrit : > >> We are exploring migrating from a III Sierra system to Alma or OCLC WMS. >> Does anyone have any experience with a similar migration you'd be willing >> to share? >> >> -- > Paul Poulain, Associé-gérant / co-owner > BibLibre, Services en logiciels libres pour les bibliothèques > BibLibre, Open Source software and services for libraries >