 |
 |
On Jul 25, 2017, at 10:58 AM, Eric Hellman <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > To follow up on Andromeda's calling the question, we need to do some things in addition to the usual dieboldotron. > > 1. There's a point of fact that is still being disputed/discussed: whether formalization is required by potential fiscal sponsor. It's straightforward to answer this before any poll is conducted - ask the potential fiscal sponsors to weigh in on the question. Hasn't that been settled by Bohyun's message yesterday? > On Jul 24, 2017, at 6:36 PM, Kim, Bohyun <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > Jonathan is right, Cary. I am on this year's LPC for the next year's C4L conference at DC, and we are already working with DLF as a fiscal sponsor. No legal entity status was required. Or is there some question that the requirements may be different for a long-term fiscal sponsorship, as opposed to a one-time sponsorship? -Esmé