 |
 |
Eric Hellman President, Free Ebook Foundation Founder, Unglue.it https://unglue.it/ https://go-to-hellman.blogspot.com/ twitter: @gluejar > On Jul 25, 2017, at 11:18 AM, Esmé Cowles <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > On Jul 25, 2017, at 10:58 AM, Eric Hellman <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >> To follow up on Andromeda's calling the question, we need to do some things in addition to the usual dieboldotron. >> >> 1. There's a point of fact that is still being disputed/discussed: whether formalization is required by potential fiscal sponsor. It's straightforward to answer this before any poll is conducted - ask the potential fiscal sponsors to weigh in on the question. > > Hasn't that been settled by Bohyun's message yesterday? > >> On Jul 24, 2017, at 6:36 PM, Kim, Bohyun <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >> Jonathan is right, Cary. I am on this year's LPC for the next year's C4L conference at DC, and we are already working with DLF as a fiscal sponsor. No legal entity status was required. > > > Or is there some question that the requirements may be different for a long-term fiscal sponsorship, as opposed to a one-time sponsorship? > > -Esmé There were multiple threads with conflicting assertions. Bethany's post answers definitively as to CLIR. From the discussion, I understand that LITA also requires 2 LITA members as point of contact. It may be that other organizations may have different requirements, but I think we have enough to proceed.