 |
 |
Hi, On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Eric Lease Morgan <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > On Sep 20, 2017, at 12:50 PM, Jonathan Rochkind <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > Honestly, if they felt up to it, I would not be at all opposed to an actual > > recommendation or recommendations from the FCIG. They're the ones who have > > spent way (way!) more time than anyone else investigating and considering > > this, I'd appreciate their input in the form of an actual > > suggestion/recommendation if a preferred path or paths have become clear to > > them. > > We here in FCIG Land have had lots o’ healthy discussion regarding all of the > issues. That said, I do not believe there is consensus within the Group such > that an actual recommendation can be made. —Eric Morgan Indeed. I think I can fairly say that the FCIG does have a consensus insofar that we recommend that we do not stick with the status quo. The disagreement lies in which of the alternatives to pursue. Regards, Galen -- Galen Charlton Infrastructure and Added Services Manager Equinox Open Library Initiative phone: 1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457) email: [log in to unmask] web: https://equinoxInitiative.org direct: +1 770-709-5581 cell: +1 404-984-4366