 |
 |
Someone is on the list is bound to have extra megabytes left on their archive.org sub at the end of the period. Maybe we could have a wiki page describing the best crawl config so nothing gets left out? Remember that re-crawling the same content doesn't incur a cost... cheers stuart -- ...let us be heard from red core to black sky On 13 December 2017 at 07:48, Kyle Banerjee <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Eric Lease Morgan <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > As I sit here watching my EAD files get indexed by Solr, I ask myself, > “To > > what degree are we — the Code4Lib community — curating our content?” > > > > Seriously, our “community” generates content, and the bulk of it takes > > three or four forms: the mailing list, the journal, the wiki, and > > conference agendas/schedules. How “important” is this content? While it > my > > very well be backed up, and while it may very well be restorable, I > wonder > > about its intrinsic values... > > > > Generally speaking, if you have to wonder about the value of something, you > already have the answer.... ;) > > But seriously, just because a theoretical use case can be imagined is not a > good reason to dedicate resources -- this is the very definition of a > solution looking for a problem. > > Whether or not content is formally organized, the good stuff has and will > continue to permeate thinking/systems/processes elsewhere. > > kyle >