 |
 |
1. A combination of both. Around 60TB already digitized, with over 100TB more footage still in analog form. 2. Portable hard drives, a RAID, a Mac Pro tower. 3. No, we do not have a digitization workflow defined yet. 4. Define "quick access." I think that we do want "quick access" unless we also have something like a local NAS for immediate access to the files and then AWS strictly as secondary backup copies. On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 12:58 PM, Matthew Patulski <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Hello Kyle, > The short answer is AWS and other cloud services are Ideal for backing up > many TB of media like video. Netflix started their hosting in AWS for > instance. A few questions: > > 1. When you say you have 200TB that you would like to digitize are these > analog tapes to be digitized and you need a destination or you actually > have 200TB of files. > 2. If it is the latter where does the media sit right now? > 3. If it is the former do you have a digitization workflow defined yet? > 4. Are you wanting to have quick access to this media say for > scholarship or reuse or is it just about having back ups? > > > With Regards, > > *Matthew Patulski* > listening / thinking / doing > > +1 (616) 361-3951 / [log in to unmask] / linkedin.com/in/mrpatulski >