Good thought, but given that the image is 2400x3140 and many of the numbers are much higher I can't make that make sense. I'm wondering if there is some sort of scaling algorithm going on, or if I've just gone down a very dark rabbit hole..... On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 9:58 AM Joshua Westgard <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Could the coordinates be the x/y for the upper left corner, followed by > horizontal and vertical offsets to describe the location of the other > corner? That seems like it might work just based on the numbers. >