There is some work comparing topic modeling to qualitative analysis. Here are two papers I'd suggest: Baumer, Eric P. S., David Mimno, Shion Guha, Emily Quan, and Geri K. Gay. “Comparing Grounded Theory and Topic Modeling: Extreme Divergence or Unlikely Convergence?” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 68, no. 6 (2017): 1397–1410. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23786 Roberts, Margaret E., Brandon M. Stewart, Dustin Tingley, Christopher Lucas, Jetson Leder-Luis, Shana Kushner Gadarian, Bethany Albertson, and David G. Rand. “Structural Topic Models for Open-Ended Survey Responses.” American Journal of Political Science 58, no. 4 (2014): 1064–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12103 I'd welcome others! -Jodi On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 9:40 AM Eric Lease Morgan <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > On Sep 9, 2022, at 11:25 AM, Kimberli Kelmor < > [log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > A while back we kind of talked around qualitative analysis tools. I'd > like to query the group about it directly, though. > > > > What do people use for qualitative data analysis and storage? I've used > NVivo before and liked it, but it is pricey and maybe both under and > overkill. What else is out there? > > > > A related question, is there an open data platform that is geared toward > qualitative data instead of quantitative data? I'm looking to find > something already available that has a strong data/document repository > layer, a strong analysis layer, and a strong and flexible presentation or > publishing layer. > > > > Many thanks for any information you can share! > > > > -- > > Kimberli M. Kelmor > > > Please correct me if I'm wrong. In this case, "qualitative analysis tools" > are applications where one: 1) assembles a corpus of one or more documents, > 2) articulates a vocabulary of topics or themes, 3) peruses ("reads") items > in the corpus assigning vocabulary terms to parts or the whole of the > items, and 4) does statistical analysis against the assignments. In the end > the student, researcher, or scholar will address questions such as "How did > a given idea ebb and flow over time?", "To what degree do these sets of > people express a given thing?", or "How often was such and such mentioned?" > Correct? > > If this be the case, then I believe the same research questions can be > addressed more consistently and at a larger scale if natural langauge > processing (NLP) methods were applied to the corpus. At the same time, the > application of NLP ought not be considered a replacement for qualitative > analsysis tools nor tradidtional reading. Instead, the application of NLP > ought to be considered a supplemental method of analysis. > > -- > Eric Morgan > Navari Family Center for Digital Scholarship > University of Notre Dame >