This study looks at how 103 law school faculty from more than 60 law
schools use artificial intelligence.  The study gives highly detailed data
on which applications they use, how they use it, and how much.  In
addition, the study takes a close look on where faculty get their training
for artificial intelligence applications, how much they feel that they need
such training, and how satisfied they are with their training.  The study
helps its reader to answer such questions as:  how many faculty have taken
AI training from their law schools?  From their law library?  Through AI or
other vendors?  How do they feel that the use of AI has impacted their
personal productivity?  What do they need from AI training that they are
not currently getting?  How much time do they spend using AI applications?


Data in the report is reported in the aggregate for the entire sample and
broken out by many institutional and personal criteria such as law school
ranking and size, and personal respondent age, gender and work title, among
other variables.


Just a few of this 55-page report’s many findings are that:


• Use of ChatGPT was higher among faculty who taught more courses, with
those teaching two or more courses spending much more time on ChatGPT than
faculty who taught less than this or not at all.


• About 35% of faculty never use AI tools in their teaching or research.


• Female faculty were more than twice as likely as male faculty to say that
their use of AI had made them more productive.


• Use of law school workshops to learn about AI was particularly common by
faculty at top 20 law schools.


To view a table of contents and an excerpt, follow the following link:
https://www.primaryresearch.com/AddCart.aspx?ReportID=820