Worldcat.org, as nice as it is, only offers a limited subset of
bibliographic data.  There's no way to get to the underlying MARC
record, as far as I can see.  Or am I missing something?

-Keith

On 9/5/06, Houghton,Andrew <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Why not use WorldCat.org?  I believe that it already contains the
> entire LC bibliographic data plus additional member input data not
> found in the LC bibliographic data.