On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Ethan Gruber <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Ben, another problem with digestibility of the search results is that it's
> not XHTML, and therefore not well-formed XML, making it impossible to
> process with XPath.
What page did you find that wasn't valid XHTML? The JSON should be
easier to process typically (no XPATH required), but I'm still
curious.
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fid.loc.gov%2Fauthorities%2Fsearch%2F%3Fq%3Dhtml&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0
//Ed
|