LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB Archives

CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB  December 2015

CODE4LIB December 2015

Subject:

Re: OCLC shutting down xISBN and xID (was Re: [CODE4LIB] Matching print and electronic editions of the same book)

From:

Karen Coombs <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 11 Dec 2015 15:20:27 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (234 lines)

OCLC has been unable to update the xID API for several months.  We strive
to provide accurate and up-to-date information for all of our users. OCLC
will continue to run xID through March 2016 to allow those who use it to
search for alternate solutions for their specific needs. Although we
appreciate the suggestions, the product in “frozen state” would become less
and less effective over time and the data it provides increasingly
outdated. We believe continuing to offer that product would not be a
service to the community.

Karen

Karen A. Coombs
OCLC · Senior Product Analyst, WorldShare Platform
6565 Kilgour Place, Dublin, OH USA 43017
T +1-800-848-5879 ext. 4068
Skype librarywebchic

On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Ross Singer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Rachel, for what it's worth, it had nothing to do with your email (we were
> notified of it a couple of weeks ago, I guess because we were one of the
> few paying customers of the service).
>
> -Ross.
>
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Maderik, Rachel A <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> > Yes, thanks Bill for pointing that out, and now of course I'm regretting
> > my initial email. Regardless of the rate limit and lack of updates, this
> > API still has enormous value, and I'm sorry to see they're responding by
> > shutting it down (instead of keeping it on in a "frozen" state, if
> nothing
> > else).
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> > Fleming, Jason
> > Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 12:06 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] OCLC shutting down xISBN and xID (was Re:
> > [CODE4LIB] Matching print and electronic editions of the same book)
> >
> > As a heavy user of the xID service I would look forward to a discussion
> > about what alternatives there might be.
> >
> > Thank you Bill for the link t to that announcement.
> >
> >
> > -Jason
> >
> > Jason Fleming
> > Information Technology Librarian
> >
> > 601 South College Road | Wilmington, NC  28403-5990
> > T: 910-962-2675 | [log in to unmask]
> > http://library.uncw.edu
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> > William Denton
> > Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 11:44 AM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: [CODE4LIB] OCLC shutting down xISBN and xID (was Re: [CODE4LIB]
> > Matching print and electronic editions of the same book)
> >
> > Rachel's message evidently prompted this:
> >
> > http://www.oclc.org/developer/news/2015/change-to-xid-services.en.html
> >
> > "OCLC offers an array of APIs that provide additional access points to
> > WorldCat and the WorldShare platform, allowing libraries and partners to
> > use the data inside applications in new and creative ways.  While we add
> > APIs at times, we also must retire some.  The xID product, including
> xISBN,
> > xISSN and xOCLCNum, has experience low usage and will be retired from the
> > OCLC API offering. No new keys are being issued, and the service will be
> > unavailable beginning March 15, 2016."
> >
> > OCLC people:  how about releasing the data behind the xID services?  A
> big
> > static dump of all of the numbers (ISBN, LCCN, OCLCnum) and how they're
> > related.
> > It'll be out of date the next day, but it'll still be very, very useful.
> >
> > When you needed them, the xID services were EXTREMELY helpful.  Perhaps
> > part of the cause of low usage was the access restrictions, both of
> number
> > of requests and commercial use.  If the data had been open, many more
> uses
> > would have arisen.  I say make it open now, under something like an Open
> > Data Commons Attribution License.
> >
> > Bill
> >
> >
> > On 10 December 2015, Maderik, Rachel A wrote:
> >
> > > Just a warning about OCLC's xID API: a few weeks ago I requested an
> > access token to bypass the rate limit, and was told that they are no
> longer
> > giving these out. I was also told that the data in xID has not been
> updated
> > for some time (I don't know when they stopped, but I think the rep told
> me
> > it was at least a year out of date). It was very disappointing to learn
> > this; if the project is essentially dead, this fact should be advertised
> > (at the very least, they should take down the pricing list!).
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
> > > Of William Denton
> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 5:40 PM
> > > To: [log in to unmask]
> > > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Matching print and electronic editions of the
> > > same book
> > >
> > > Thanks!  That opens things up.  We do have a lot of OCLC numbers.  For
> > > my example book, there's an 035 with three of them, including
> > > 841051199. If I look at
> > >
> > > http://worldcat.org/oclc/841051199
> > >
> > > it takes me to the human-readable page, but
> > >
> > > http://worldcat.org/oclc/841051199.rdf
> > >
> > > shows it all in RDF, and I can see a lot of things like
> > >
> > > <rdf:Description
> > > rdf:about="http://experiment.worldcat.org/entity/work/data/1613596711#
> > > Place/japan">
> > >
> > > so I can pick out the work ID and look it up.  (Perhaps the work ID be
> > > specified directly there?)
> > >
> > > So that would work, but aha, I just noticed I could make it a little
> > simpler by using xOCLCNUM to get the work ID, which is the owi field
> here:
> > >
> > > http://xisbn.worldcat.org/webservices/xid/oclcnum/841051199?method=get
> > > Metadata&format=json&fl=*
> > >
> > > And then I can go to
> > >
> > > http://experiment.worldcat.org/entity/work/data/1613596711.rdf
> > >
> > > and get all the workExample links, and use those OCLC numbers.
> > >
> > > (Which I'm sure you knew, Roy, but perhaps didn't mention because of
> > > the rate-limiting, but as far as I know our subscription means I can
> > > get an access token so I can do some larger queries.)
> > >
> > > A first run of something like this would take a while to process
> > everything, but I'd store locally what I need to know, and then
> incremental
> > updates for a month's worth of news ebooks wouldn't take long.  Thanks!
> > >
> > > Bill
> > >
> > > On 9 December 2015, Roy Tennant wrote:
> > >
> > >> Do you have an OCLC number in your records? If so, you could call it
> > >> at WorldCat like this:
> > >>
> > >> http://worldcat.org/oclc/XXXXXXX
> > >>
> > >> scrape the structured linked data on the page, looking for the
> > >> "Example of Work" link, then follow it to the Work Record:
> > >>
> > >> http://experiment.worldcat.org/entity/work/data/1613596711
> > >>
> > >> That then will give you all of the OCLC numbers that we consider are
> > >> part of that work (under the "WorkExample" tab).
> > >>
> > >> I know, not an optimal solution even if you have the OCLC number. But
> > >> it could work if you do.
> > >> Roy
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:37 PM, William Denton <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I'm looking at how to match print (p) and electronic (e) editions of
> > >>> the same book in our collection.  There is no connection between
> > >>> them in our system (VuFind in front of Symphony).
> > >>>
> > >>> For example, two catalogue entries for two versions of COMPOSING
> > >>> JAPANESE MUSICAL MODERNITY, entirely separate:
> > >>>
> > >>> + https://www.library.yorku.ca/find/Record/3238132
> > >>> + https://www.library.yorku.ca/find/Record/3311584
> > >>>
> > >>> I want know they're the same book so I can do more usage and
> > >>> collection analysis.  I've been looking at two ways of doing it with
> > >>> data available right now:
> > >>>
> > >>> 1 a) MARC 020 (ISBN) can list multiple ISBNs. We have e books where
> > >>> the p editions are listed.
> > >>>
> > >>> 1 b) MARC 776 (additional physical form entry) for e books can list
> > >>> a p ISBN or other control number. If we have that edition, great. If
> > >>> not, need to go from e -> p-we-don't-have -> p-we-do-have, which I
> > >>> could do with xISBN.
> > >>>
> > >>> 2) OCLC's xISBN. When it reports other editions of the same work, it
> > >>> can include e versions.
> > >>>
> > >>> There is also:
> > >>>
> > >>> 3) Vendors supplying data.  For example, YBP seems to have all the p
> > >>> and e editions of books tied together.  We could ask.
> > >>>
> > >>> I've been looking around but can't find any discussion about making
> > >>> these connections.  Have any of you done it?  Know of it being done
> > >>> in code I can see? Written it up?
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks for any pointers,
> > >>>
> > >>> Bill
> > >>> --
> > >>> William Denton ↔  Toronto, Canada ↔  https://www.miskatonic.org/
> > >>
> > >
> > > --
> > > William Denton ↔  Toronto, Canada ↔  https://www.miskatonic.org/
> > >
> >
> > --
> > William Denton ↔  Toronto, Canada ↔  https://www.miskatonic.org/
> >
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.CLIR.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager