LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB Archives

CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB  July 2019

CODE4LIB July 2019

Subject:

Re: From the Community Support Squad wrt "Note [admiistratativia]" Warning, contains way too much information

From:

BWS Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 15 Jul 2019 08:52:00 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (222 lines)

 Dear All,
      I have winced quite a bit reading this thread. I'm certain I am not alone in this sludgy feeling. I trust in Ye Olde Internet Meme that you all possess delete keys and know how to use them. For use example [1].

      I can no longer remain politely silent on this issue. Doing so betrays other women and other survivors and misses a teachable moment, which cheapens this forum and the discourse at large. A hearty thank you to those people who understand and have been supportive in this thread.

      I am speaking for myself not any group I might belong to.

      ****I would also warn anyone suffering from trauma to skip this email. It is not my intention or wish to retraumatise you.****
      TL;DR: hit dogs holler. Discussion of oppression ceases when antagonism stops.

      Let me state several factors that are personal in nature, some of which I am incapable of changing, and might bear weight on the current discussion. First, despite chronic algorithmic misgendering, I remain female. I also remain chirpy about having rights equal to those of the more fragile male sex. This radical idea has cost me opportunities and pay in a self-styled intellectual field more times than I wish to recount despite having a diploma from the best institution in the field. [2] What one is paid and one's true worth might not be the same thing. Outside of this field, please see the USNWT. [3]
       Furthermore, I am a rape survivor. This was not within the context of a Library setting. It seemed like a statistical inevitability. [4] I have been kissed without being asked about it. This has happened within the context of a Library setting. I have received credible death threats. I have been stalked repeatedly. I have been propositioned dozens of times in a Library setting. I have been touched without consent hundreds of times. I cannot imagine what other people who are far more intelligent and fairer of form suffer.

       I am sure my own behaviour has been suspect in past, which I have tried to correct and account for in addition to acknowledging my own mistakes and apologising for them.
       I am bisexual. This is not correlated or causal to the rape paragraph, despite white men assuring me more times than I wish to recall that might be the case. I would submit that my argument on my own sexuality hinges on the uncomfortable fact that I was attracted to men and women before I was raped. If it is any comfort to the weaker sex, I have published academically on my sexuality, not that it is any of anyone's business.

       Truly, I would love to live in a world where these things would silo themselves off and be irrelevant factors. Gentlemen, I assure you that such a case simply is not the reality we ladies live. I would further add that there are men who feel harassed and men who are rape survivors. It seems statistically likely that some of those men are reading this list. I also acknowledge that gender is not binary, but in largely speaking from a place of personal experience, the non binary people are in most instances not they who have caused discomfort in my world. DOJ backs this up. [5]
       Why must one demand an institutional cost of entry to contribute to technical discussions? Are there not interesting contributions from all quarters? Consultants do not have institutional affiliations. Are we to ignore an entire subclass of field experts? Will we draw the line at Ivy League institutions? Raise the bar to only the greater Ivies? Shall we again ignore that most institutions are small institutions? Shall we accept the fallacy that those at small institutions also possess small minds? Is it strictly necessary to believe that where one comes from is more important than what one says? It is far too late to not get me started on the persistence necessary to gain entry to the ivory tower in the first place. Rapunzel, Rapunzel, let down your few and far between scholarly awards. [6]

        Is it really a good idea to demand that those with fewer resources allocate that which is needed to frippery to shore up shaky privileged egos and perpetuate a system that does not favour the oppressed rather than redirecting that time and energy towards aedunno anything else?

        Anonymity, funnily enough, can sometimes help to shield those that have suffered violence. Yes, it is imperfect. However, I have found it helps winnow the inevitable harassment that is the perennial reward for those who are bold enough to say "Me too" from unbearable to merely exceedingly annoying. It is a shade of gray that some of us rely upon. There are an array of good reasons™ why someone might choose to remain anonymous. Please do consult MacKinnon for good examples™[7]

         Lest we forget, those with ladyparts until fairly recently in history were forced to publish either pseudonymously or hope that one of the members of the lesser sex would take our ideas and let us bask in the knowledge that their aims were advanced by our hard misattributed work. [8] As of a few years ago, men were 8 times more likely to get published by virtue of their names alone. [9]
          I look forward to privileged white men once again threatening me off list, phoning my employer to have me canned, cockblocking my advancement, possibly assaulting me again [it's been done lads, explore something new], foiling my academic progression, hitting on me in the pub yet not paying for my drinks, responding that my citations are not from reputable sources / cover vaguely different material while their own vague baseless assertions are not cited, et cetera.
Come at me, Patriarchy,BWS Johnson

[1]The Mac OS X Delete Key: It Goes Both Ways The Mac OS X Delete Key: It Goes Both Ways

|
|
|
| | |

 |

 |
|
| |
The Mac OS X Delete Key: It Goes Both Ways

Matthew Rogers

One of the biggest pet peeves for users who switch to Mac from Windows is the Delete key, because it feels backw...
 |

 |

 |



[2] Banking slips and CV available upon request for comparison

[3] Revealed: the $730,000 gender pay gap in US World Cup bonuses

|
|
|
| | |

 |

 |
|
| |
Revealed: the $730,000 gender pay gap in US World Cup bonuses

The US women’s team have earned $90,000 in bonuses for reaching the World Cup quarter-finals, a sum that would b...
 |

 |

 |



[4] Violence Against American Indian and Alaska Native Women and Menhttps://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/249736.pdf
[5]Sexual Assault: The Numbers | Responding to Transgender Victims of Sexual Assault

|
|
|
| | |

 |

 |
|
| |
Sexual Assault: The Numbers | Responding to Transgender Victims of Sexua...

Office for Victims of Crime (OVC)

This guide covers the basics of what it means to be transgender, provides information about the high rate of sex...
 |

 |

 |



[6] Grimm's Fairy Tales, Rapunzel


|
|
| |
Grimm 012: Rapunzel


 |

 |

 |


[7]Consent of the Networked Facebookistan and Googledom

|
|
|
| | |

 |

 |
|
| |
Facebookistan and Googledom

Excerpt from Consent of the Networked: The Worldwide Struggle for Internet Freedom by Rebecca MacKinnon (2012, B...
 |

 |

 |


[8]5 Inspiring Female Authors Who Wrote Under Male Pen Names Read - ENTITY

|
|
|
| | |

 |

 |
|
| |
5 Inspiring Female Authors Who Wrote Under Male Pen Names Read - ENTITY

Women have been writing under male pen names since before the Victorian age. And for some, especially during tim...
 |

 |

 |




[9]Female author experiments with male pen name, gets staggering results

|
|
|
| | |

 |

 |
|
| |
Female author experiments with male pen name, gets staggering results

Catherine Nichols received many more responses from agents as a man
 |

 |

 |




    On Sunday, July 14, 2019, 10:26:37 PM EDT, Stuart A. Yeates <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
 
 I was personally ambivalent about anonymity on the mailing list.

However, the fact that it appears to be predominantly men arguing for
banning anonymity and women arguing for allowing it is a tell that us
men folk might have our lower appendages in our orifices.

cheers
stuart
--
...let us be heard from red core to black sky

On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 at 14:12, Edward Almasy
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 14, 2019, at 8:36pm, Eric Lease Morgan <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > IMHO, the Code4Lib mailing list should not be akin to an anonymous chat room where anyone can come in and say whatever they desire under the cloak of anonymity.
> > One must be accountable for what they say, and accountability is increased by knowledge of the source. It is similar to information literacy and citing one's references so the validity of an argument can be substantiated.
>
> There is also the issue of bias.  Knowing, for example, that someone is from an institution or organization that has invested heavily in a particular platform or toolset can help put their views or advocacy into context.
>
> I think allowing anonymous or pseudonymous posts in this context decreases the integrity and value of the discourse.
>
> Ed
>
>
> --
> Edward Almasy <[log in to unmask]>
> Director  •  Internet Scout Research Group
> Computer Sciences Dept  •  U of Wisconsin - Madison
> 1210 W Dayton St  •  Madison WI 53706  •  3HCV+J6
> 608-262-6606 (voice)  •  608-265-9296 (fax)

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.CLIR.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager