That must have been a bug I think, Francis - Gimp definitely doesn't
(intentionally!) change an image on disk without saving it, and prefers its
own file format pretty aggressively.  I'm incredibly curious as to what
happened there!

Non-destructive editing here I think is an unrelated deal - this is about
being able to do some kinds of edits without like... applying them to the
underlying data in memory, so that they're reversible/can be
enabled/disabled to test them?

- Dave

On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 10:35 AM Francis Kayiwa <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> On 1/15/25 10:36 AM, McDonald, Stephen wrote:
> > I'm not sure what you mean--Gimp doesn't touch the original image unless
> you tell it to.
> I mean that I opened an image to manipulate it and it altered it. I am
> pretty sure I mentioned that it's been a minute.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t0bpGdpBvvw&t=538s
>
> ./fxk
>