LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB Archives

CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB  March 2012

CODE4LIB March 2012

Subject:

Re: Q.: MARC8 vs. MARC/Unicode and pymarc and misencoded III records

From:

"Reese, Terry" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 8 Mar 2012 12:38:34 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (26 lines)

Ed, 

Sure -- but this is one part of a much larger process.  MarcEdit has two MARC algorithms, one that is a strict processing algorithm, and one that is a loose processing algorithm that is able to process data that would be otherwise invalid for most processors (and this is done because in the real world, vendors send bad records...often.  Anyway, the character encoding is actually one of the last things MarcEdit does before writing the processed file to disk.  The reason for this is that MarcEdit reads and interacts with MARC data at the bit level, meaning characterset is pretty meaningless for the vast majority of the work that it does.  When writing to disk though, .NET requests the filestream to be set to the correct encoding, otherwise data can be flattened and diacritics lost.  

Essentially at that last step, the record is passed to a function called RecognizeUTF8 that takes a byte array.  The program then enumerates the bytes to determine if the record is recognizable as UTF8 using a process based loosely around some of the work done by the International Components for Unicode (http://site.icu-project.org/) -- who have some incredible C libraries that do much more than you'd ever need to know how to do.  While these don't work in C# -- they demonstrate some well-known methods for evaluating byte level data for code page evaluation.

Of course, one area where I split directions is that I'm not interested in other charactersets and MARC data with poorly coded UTF8 data needs to be forced to render as MARC8 (my opinion) until the invalid characters are corrected.  So, in my process, invalid UTF8 data will flag the process and force data output in the mnemonic data format I use for MARC8 encoded data.

Does that make sense?

--TR

-----Original Message-----
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ed Summers
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 12:19 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Q.: MARC8 vs. MARC/Unicode and pymarc and misencoded III records

Hi Terry,

On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Reese, Terry <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> This is one of the reasons you really can't trust the information found in position 9.  This is one of the reasons why when I wrote MarcEdit, I utilize a mixed process when working with data and determining characterset -- a process that reads this byte and takes the information under advisement, but in the end treats it more as a suggestion and one part of a larger heuristic analysis of the record data to determine whether the information is in UTF8 or not.  Fortunately, determining if a set of data is in UTF8 or something else, is a fairly easy process.  Determining the something else is much more difficult, but generally not necessary.

Can you describe in a bit more detail how MARCEdit sniffs the record to determine the encoding? This has come up enough times w/ pymarc to make it worth implementing.

//Ed

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.CLIR.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager