Thanks David, but another link on the same site you cite ;-) shows MS
still up to their old tricks:
http://news.com.com/Apache%2C+open-source+groups+wary+of+Sender+ID/2100-1013_3-5345317.html?tag=st.pop
I hope the Apache folk stick to their guns on this.
Thanks also for the "preview" plugin. Every little bit helps.
David Huckleby wrote:
> Due to the recent Lawsuit against Microsoft,
> http://news.com.com/Will+Microsoft+tweak+IE%3F/2100-1012_3-5069943.html?tag=nl
>
> courtesy of /., many sites that only work with IE may have to change a
> bit
> and IE may even be changed.
>
> This link is to IE View. What it does: Adds "View page in Internet
> Explorer"
> links to the content and link context menu. Handy for previewing pages in
> IE, loading up IE-only pages when you run across them in Mozilla, etc.
> http://update.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php?id=35&vid=156
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> David
>
>> From: Jeffrey Barnett <[log in to unmask]>
>> Reply-To: Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: [CODE4LIB] Pros and Cons of XUL development
>> Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 09:54:45 -0400
>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>> Received: from pickering.cc.nd.edu ([129.74.250.225]) by
>> mc6-f15.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Fri, 3 Sep
>> 2004
>> 07:06:43 -0700
>> Received: from hazard (hazard.cc.nd.edu [129.74.250.229])by
>> pickering.cc.nd.edu (Switch-3.1.6a/Switch-3.1.0) with ESMTP id
>> i83C4bHG013725;Fri, 3 Sep 2004 08:54:48 -0500 (EST)
>> Received: from LISTSERV.ND.EDU by LISTSERV.ND.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP
>> release
>> 1.8d) with spool id 10407169 for [log in to unmask];
>> Fri, 3
>> Sep 2004 08:54:48 -0500
>> Received: from pickering.cc.nd.edu (pickering.cc.nd.edu
>> [129.74.250.225])
>> by hazard.cc.nd.edu (Switch-3.1.4/Switch-3.1.0) with ESMTP id
>> i83DslrT029564 for <[log in to unmask]>; Fri, 3 Sep 2004
>> 08:54:47 -0500 (EST)
>> Received: from pantheon-po05.its.yale.edu (pantheon-po05.its.yale.edu
>> [130.132.50.34]) by pickering.cc.nd.edu (Switch-3.1.6a/Switch-3.1.0)
>> with ESMTP id i83Dskb8005962 for <[log in to unmask]>;
>> Fri, 3
>> Sep 2004 08:54:46 -0500 (EST)
>> Received: from [130.132.80.102] (systems13.library.yale.edu
>> [130.132.80.102]) by pantheon-po05.its.yale.edu
>> (8.12.11/8.12.11)
>> with ESMTP id i83DskMj004147 for <[log in to unmask]>;
>> Fri,
>> 3 Sep 2004 09:54:46 -0400
>> X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jG+3ud4AyYVgWCjCNeftPqJ
>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7)
>> Gecko/20040616
>> X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
>> X-YaleITSMailFilter: Version 1.2a (attachment(s) not renamed)
>> X-ND-MTA-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 08:55:16 -0500 (EST)
>> X-ND-Virus-Scan: engine v4.3.20; dat v4389
>> Approved-By: Jeffrey Barnett <[log in to unmask]>
>> Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Organization: Yale University Library
>> Return-Path: [log in to unmask]
>> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Sep 2004 14:06:44.0818 (UTC)
>> FILETIME=[3E988320:01C491BF]
>>
>> I've been a Mozilla and more recently Firefox user for a long time, but
>> only recently noticed the availability of extensions. (I know :") ) I'm
>> really excited by the extensibility, but cautious about the tie-in to a
>> single browser development environment. I know Microsoft ignores this
>> all the time, and unfortunately I'm finding more and more sites that
>> seem to *require* IE to use. My question is, even though the underlying
>> XML is "open" and "standard", doesn't the use of XUL lead to the same
>> sort of "lock out" for users of typical "public" services, such as
>> libraries who frequently have no choice (or even knowledge) of which
>> browser to use?
>>
>> Is there anything that can be done, or has been done, to take these
>> great extensions, and the tools to create them and make them coexist
>> with or "embrace and extend" the IE universe?
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Check out Election 2004 for up-to-date election news, plus voter tools
> and
> more! http://special.msn.com/msn/election2004.armx
|
