Thanks, Thom, for solving this problem 20 years too late.

-Ross.

On 8/16/06, Hickey,Thom <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> I see the problem.  You really should have been using the (4,4) key for
> searching.
>
> --Th
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> Eric Lease Morgan
> Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 11:50 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] position announcement [retrospective conversion]
>
> On Aug 16, 2006, at 11:46 AM, Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
>
> > The following position announcement from PALINET (Philadelphia, PA)
> > was brought to my attention:
>
>
> In an almost completely unrelated note, I worked for PALINET in 1986
> or so. My job was to read physical catalog cards all from a specific
> library, search OCLC (4,2,2,1) for the best match, and then assign an
> OCLC number to the card. I think I was helping with a retrospective
> conversion process, and I remember I didn't do very well at the job.
> Too much detail.
>
> --
> Eric Morgan
> University Libraries of Notre Dame
>
>