s/customer/"partner"/

Also, in the case of what the thread was initially calling for, what
would be the legalities of redistributing this data?

-Ross.

On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Ross Singer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I'm going to go out on a limb here and assume you need to be an OCLC
> customer to benefit from this?
>
> -Ross.
>
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Houghton,Andrew <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
>>> Ross Singer
>>> Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 7:45 PM
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] LOC Authority Data
>>>
>>> Also, I noticed another dump on the IA of Library of Congress updates
>>> since the initial "Bisson load".
>>> http://www.archive.org/details/marc_loc_updates
>>>
>>> In typical IA fashion, it's incredibly difficult to know what the hell
>>> this stuff is, though.
>>> -Ross.
>>
>> If you just looking for access to the LCSH authority data, you can access it through our Terminology Services project.  The data in our SRW server was updated to the 2008-09-17 weekly update from LC.  The SRW server is located at the URI:
>>
>> <http://tspilot.oclc.org/lcsh/>
>>
>> Looking for access to other authority files:
>>
>> FAST            <http://tspilot.oclc.org/fast/>
>> GSAFD           <http://tspilot.oclc.org/gsafd/>
>> MeSH            <http://tspilot.oclc.org/mesh/>
>> TGM I           <http://tspilot.oclc.org/lctgm/>
>> TGM II  <http://tspilot.oclc.org/gmgpc/>
>>
>>
>> Andy.
>>
>