Ross Singer writes:
 > There should be no issue with having both, mainly because like I
 > mentioned earlier, nobody cares about info:uris.
 >
 > Take, for instance, DOIs. What do you see in the wild? Do you ever
 > see info:uris (except in OpenURLs)? If you don't see
 > http://dx.doi.org/ URIs you generally see doi:10... URIs. It seems
 > like having http and info URIs would *have* to be fine, since
 > info:uris *not being dereferenceable* are far less useful (I won't go
 > so far as 'useless') on the web, which is where all this is happening.

What on earth does dereferencing have to do with this?

We're talking about an identifier.

 _/|_ ___________________________________________________________________
/o ) \/ Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]> http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\ You can never go back -- only forwards, or stand still.