Aha, cool! Yeah, I could use tag for this, but it wouldn't seem
appropriate for something I want to encourage others to use compatibly
as well, info seems better.
Houghton,Andrew wrote:
>> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
>> Jonathan Rochkind
>> Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 4:52 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] registering info: uris?
>>
>> Also, the date aspect of a tag-uri seems to make it hard to use to mint
>> an identifier that will always represent the same SuDoc, regardless of
>> when it was minted.
>>
>
> No the date part is a versioning scheme, not the date you created the
> tag URI. It's used, for example, where I created a specific tag
> scheme one day and then decided to create another tag scheme some
> other day:
>
> tag:example.org,1999:date/yy-mm-dd
>
> where yy-mm-dd is the year, month and day values. Then I realize that
> it's Y2K so I create a new tag scheme:
>
> tag:example.org,2000:date/yyyy-mm-dd
>
>
> Andy.
>
|