On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, Peter Schlumpf wrote:
>> From: Alex Osborne <[log in to unmask]>
>> If I'm understanding you correctly, what you have in mind is a
>> triplestore. A database for storing purely relationship triples and
> Close. What I have in mind looks more like just pure objects and
>pointers. Think in purely abstract terms at this level. It's possible
>to have one to many relationships from one object to many other
>objects. It would be possible to group sets of objects together by
>using a single "proxy" object in this database that refers to the
>others. But I'm starting to digress.
All of which are possible in a TripleStore :)
Or an Object-Relational database, but a triple store would likely find
more support in the community.
I would encourage looking at rdf triplestores seriously, if the graph
approach is the direction that you want to go in.