-1 on removing delicious

--jay

On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Jodi Schneider <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I appreciate having delicious in the planet. Code4Lib's usage of this is one
> of the few reasons I'm still using delicious (which then posts for me to
> pinboard.in).
>
> I'd appreciate more organization of code4lib photos, if anybody wants to
> take stewardship of the flickr group we seem to have...
>
> -Jodi
>
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Michael J. Giarlo <
> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Reasonable arguments.  The nice thing is that if delicious is removed,
>> you can just subscribe to:
>>
>>     http://feeds.delicious.com/v2/rss/tag/code4lib
>>
>> Ultimately this comes down to preference and jrochkind's stewardship.
>> :) (Personally, I've always found the delicious stuff a distraction; I
>> can already track that elsewhere.)
>>
>> -Mike
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 17:35, Rosalyn Metz <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> > I agree with Ranti. Delicious has become a way for us to share articles
>> we find interesting to other people following the planet feed. I would hate
>> for that medium to disappear.
>> >
>> > Rosalyn
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with SprintSpeed
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From:         Ranti Junus <[log in to unmask]>
>> > Date:         Mon, 1 Mar 2010 17:25:07
>> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Planet code4lib - FLICKR
>> >
>> > I'm a bit hesitant about removing delicious from the feed because I
>> > think this burst is a temporary only. I like the idea that anything
>> > code4lib will come in "one feed package" (that is, I don't have to go
>> > and check on separate places.) But one's mileage might vary. If the
>> > majority want it removed from the feed, then it's fine by me.
>> >
>> >
>> > ranti.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Kevin S. Clarke <[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote:
>> >> +1 to all that as well
>> >>
>> >> Kevin
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Michael J. Giarlo
>> >> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> >>> +1 to removing flickr
>> >>> +1 to removing delicious as well
>> >>> +1 to jrochkind using his discretion
>> >>>
>> >>> -Mike
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 11:36, Jonathan Rochkind <[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote:
>> >>>> Yep, I agree, I'll remove flickr from the planet.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> CC'ing code4lib listserv in case anyone cares, you can make your case
>> (on
>> >>>> list or in private email to me), but at the moment as 'editor' of the
>> planet
>> >>>> I'm exersizing my editorial discretion to agree with Bernadette (I had
>> the
>> >>>> same opinion, but was waiting to see if any 'users' asked for it
>> before
>> >>>> doing it. :) ).
>> >>>>
>> >>>> [Other options for awareness of code4lib photos: 1)  Someone could add
>> a
>> >>>> link to flickr search for tag code4lib to the code4lib home page,
>> perhaps
>> >>>> under 'photos'.   2) If you happen to know that there are a bunch of
>> photos
>> >>>> at a given time (like now), you could delicious-bookmark the _search
>> >>>> results_ for 'code4lib' tag on flickr.  Delicious tag code4lib is
>> still on
>> >>>> the planet. But please don't bookmark every individual photo, or we'll
>> be
>> >>>> back at square 1, heh. 3) Something else I haven't thought of. ]
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Jonathan
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Feb 27, 2010, at 2:33 PM, Bernadette Houghton wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Hi Eric, all the code4lib photos currently being posted on flickr
>> are
>> >>>>>> playing havoc with my feed reader and driving me around the bend.
>> Would it
>> >>>>>> be possible to remove that feed from planet code4lib? Or at least,
>> if photos
>> >>>>>> must be posted, can they be posted to a single web page so that feed
>> readers
>> >>>>>> don't get clogged up with 200 or so photos. There must have been at
>> least
>> >>>>>> that many in these past few days.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I'm sorry, but I am unable to help you in this regard. Maybe Jonathan
>> >>>>> Rochkind <[log in to unmask]> will be able to help...
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Bulk mail.  Postage paid.
>> >
>>
>