Jay Luker wrote:
> -1 on removing delicious
>
> --jay
>
If anyone is counting:
removing_delicious--
Edward
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Jodi Schneider <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> I appreciate having delicious in the planet. Code4Lib's usage of this is one
>> of the few reasons I'm still using delicious (which then posts for me to
>> pinboard.in).
>>
>> I'd appreciate more organization of code4lib photos, if anybody wants to
>> take stewardship of the flickr group we seem to have...
>>
>> -Jodi
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Michael J. Giarlo <
>> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Reasonable arguments. The nice thing is that if delicious is removed,
>>> you can just subscribe to:
>>>
>>> http://feeds.delicious.com/v2/rss/tag/code4lib
>>>
>>> Ultimately this comes down to preference and jrochkind's stewardship.
>>> :) (Personally, I've always found the delicious stuff a distraction; I
>>> can already track that elsewhere.)
>>>
>>> -Mike
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 17:35, Rosalyn Metz <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I agree with Ranti. Delicious has become a way for us to share articles
>>>>
>>> we find interesting to other people following the planet feed. I would hate
>>> for that medium to disappear.
>>>
>>>> Rosalyn
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with SprintSpeed
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Ranti Junus <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 17:25:07
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Planet code4lib - FLICKR
>>>>
>>>> I'm a bit hesitant about removing delicious from the feed because I
>>>> think this burst is a temporary only. I like the idea that anything
>>>> code4lib will come in "one feed package" (that is, I don't have to go
>>>> and check on separate places.) But one's mileage might vary. If the
>>>> majority want it removed from the feed, then it's fine by me.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ranti.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Kevin S. Clarke <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> +1 to all that as well
>>>>>
>>>>> Kevin
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Michael J. Giarlo
>>>>> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 to removing flickr
>>>>>> +1 to removing delicious as well
>>>>>> +1 to jrochkind using his discretion
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Mike
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 11:36, Jonathan Rochkind <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>> Yep, I agree, I'll remove flickr from the planet.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> CC'ing code4lib listserv in case anyone cares, you can make your case
>>>>>>>
>>> (on
>>>
>>>>>>> list or in private email to me), but at the moment as 'editor' of the
>>>>>>>
>>> planet
>>>
>>>>>>> I'm exersizing my editorial discretion to agree with Bernadette (I had
>>>>>>>
>>> the
>>>
>>>>>>> same opinion, but was waiting to see if any 'users' asked for it
>>>>>>>
>>> before
>>>
>>>>>>> doing it. :) ).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [Other options for awareness of code4lib photos: 1) Someone could add
>>>>>>>
>>> a
>>>
>>>>>>> link to flickr search for tag code4lib to the code4lib home page,
>>>>>>>
>>> perhaps
>>>
>>>>>>> under 'photos'. 2) If you happen to know that there are a bunch of
>>>>>>>
>>> photos
>>>
>>>>>>> at a given time (like now), you could delicious-bookmark the _search
>>>>>>> results_ for 'code4lib' tag on flickr. Delicious tag code4lib is
>>>>>>>
>>> still on
>>>
>>>>>>> the planet. But please don't bookmark every individual photo, or we'll
>>>>>>>
>>> be
>>>
>>>>>>> back at square 1, heh. 3) Something else I haven't thought of. ]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jonathan
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Feb 27, 2010, at 2:33 PM, Bernadette Houghton wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Eric, all the code4lib photos currently being posted on flickr
>>>>>>>>>
>>> are
>>>
>>>>>>>>> playing havoc with my feed reader and driving me around the bend.
>>>>>>>>>
>>> Would it
>>>
>>>>>>>>> be possible to remove that feed from planet code4lib? Or at least,
>>>>>>>>>
>>> if photos
>>>
>>>>>>>>> must be posted, can they be posted to a single web page so that feed
>>>>>>>>>
>>> readers
>>>
>>>>>>>>> don't get clogged up with 200 or so photos. There must have been at
>>>>>>>>>
>>> least
>>>
>>>>>>>>> that many in these past few days.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm sorry, but I am unable to help you in this regard. Maybe Jonathan
>>>>>>>> Rochkind <[log in to unmask]> will be able to help...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Bulk mail. Postage paid.
>>>>
>>>>
|