"sexy groovy" - 43,200

On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Andrew Hankinson
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Just out of curiosity I tried them in quotes:
>
> "sexy ruby" - 72,200
> "sexy python" - 37,900
> "sexy php" - 25,100
> "sexy java" - 16,100
> "sexy asp" - 14,800
> "sexy perl" - 8,080
> "sexy C++" - 177
> "sexy FORTRAN" - 67
> "sexy COBOL" - 8
>
> I tried "sexy lisp" but the results were skewed by speech impediment fetishes. Which I'd say is even less strange than 8 people thinking you can write sexy COBOL.
>
> On 2010-03-25, at 10:20 PM, Tim Spalding wrote:
>
>>> Finally, I never would have put the strings "PHP" and "sexiness" in a sentence together (though I guess I just did).
>>
>> A simple Google search shows how very wrong you are:
>>
>> "sexy php" - 56,100,000 results
>> "sexy asp" - 8,380,000
>> "sexy java" - 6,360,000
>> "sexy ruby" - 2,840,000
>> "sexy perl" - 532,000
>> "sexy C++" - 488,000
>> "sexy smalltalk" - 113,000
>> "sexy fortran" - 107,000
>> "sexy COBOL" - 58,100
>>
>> There are also very high results for "sexy logo." Perhaps, since I was
>> in fourth grade, someone's figured out something interesting to do
>> with that stupid turtle!
>>
>> Tim
>