"sexy code4lib" - 0 (with quotes); 2,380 (without quotes)

Thanks,
Becky


"sexy librarian" - 73,700... "sexy coder" - 1,950...
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Ross Singer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> "sexy groovy" - 43,200
>
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Andrew Hankinson
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > Just out of curiosity I tried them in quotes:
> >
> > "sexy ruby" - 72,200
> > "sexy python" - 37,900
> > "sexy php" - 25,100
> > "sexy java" - 16,100
> > "sexy asp" - 14,800
> > "sexy perl" - 8,080
> > "sexy C++" - 177
> > "sexy FORTRAN" - 67
> > "sexy COBOL" - 8
> >
> > I tried "sexy lisp" but the results were skewed by speech impediment
> fetishes. Which I'd say is even less strange than 8 people thinking you can
> write sexy COBOL.
> >
> > On 2010-03-25, at 10:20 PM, Tim Spalding wrote:
> >
> >>> Finally, I never would have put the strings "PHP" and "sexiness" in a
> sentence together (though I guess I just did).
> >>
> >> A simple Google search shows how very wrong you are:
> >>
> >> "sexy php" - 56,100,000 results
> >> "sexy asp" - 8,380,000
> >> "sexy java" - 6,360,000
> >> "sexy ruby" - 2,840,000
> >> "sexy perl" - 532,000
> >> "sexy C++" - 488,000
> >> "sexy smalltalk" - 113,000
> >> "sexy fortran" - 107,000
> >> "sexy COBOL" - 58,100
> >>
> >> There are also very high results for "sexy logo." Perhaps, since I was
> >> in fourth grade, someone's figured out something interesting to do
> >> with that stupid turtle!
> >>
> >> Tim
> >
>