OCLC++
We will gladly suffer Roy Tennant's presence in exchange for continuing support.
-Mike
P.S. But seriously: OCLC++
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 12:10, Tim Shearer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> A big old thank you to OCLC for the support! It is deeply appreciated.
>
> -t
>
> On 3/3/10 10:34 AM, Roy Tennant wrote:
>>
>> On 3/3/10 3/3/10 € 7:22 AM, "Ross Singer"<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Paul Joseph<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> No need to be concerned about the vendors: they're the same suspects who
>>>> sponsored C4L10.
>>>
>>> Just to be clear on this -- the same suspects actually shelled out far
>>> less for C4L10 than they had in the past.
>>
>> Just to clarify the clarification, OCLC continued our support at the
>> highest
>> level this year, as we have since the conference began.
>> Roy
>
|
