I would rather see mail go to the main mailing list, to avoid fragmentation.
I propose using naming conventions to help people filter.
e.g. [LOCAL] Code4LibNorth
or
[LOCAL] MDV
Otherwise, I'll *never* figure out what's going on anywhere.
YMMV. -Jodi
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:54 PM, LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> *Red Letter Day!* :-)
>
> I agree with Mike.
>
> Ralph
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> > Mike Taylor
> > Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 8:33 AM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Sub-mailing lists
> >
> > For whatever little it may be worth, I'm finding that the (to me)
> > noise on this list is greatly outweighing the signal at the moment,
> > because of all the regional stuff. I'd welcome a splitting of the
> > list.
> >
> >
> > On 8 April 2010 13:28, Ranti Junus <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > > I have no preference whether the planning discussions for regional
> > > meetings would be conducted on code4lib or code4lib-[regional]. If the
> > > regional group decides to have their own list, I do appreciate the
> > > occasional shout-outs about it on the code4lib.
> > >
> > > Moreover, discussions for regionals that are located in a country
> > > where official language is not English, it would probably easier for
> > > those groups to have their own list.
> > >
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > > ranti.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Bulk mail. Postage paid.
> > >
> > >
>
|