I vote (heh) for "d" which will look a lot like "c" anyway, but with 
smatterings of owl:sameAs and Range-14 style 303's to keep things 
interesting. :)

-- 
President
BigBlueHat
P: 864.232.9553
W: http://www.bigbluehat.com/
http://www.linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung


On 4/29/10 2:01 PM, Jakob Voss wrote:
> How about a bet instead of voting. In three years will there be:
>
> a) No relevant Twitter annotations anyway
> b) Twitter annotations but not used much for bibliographic data
> c) A rich variety of incompatible bibliographic annotation standards
> d) Semantic Web will have solved every problem anyway