Wait, I'm so confused. Is SRU 2.0 actually a published standard, or are 
you just showing us a work in progress that nobody should be writing 
code to yet?

I'm confused because I thought it was just a draft work in progress, but 
then you talk about official vs unofficial copies... an unofficial copy 
of a draft work in progress that isn't a spec yet anyway?  Very confused.

If I'm planning on writing software to SRU... do you recommend I use the 
(until now not publically available so I didn't have a choice) 
"unofficial" SRU 2.0 thing, or is that still just a draft work in 
progress nobody should be writing software to yet?

Jonathan

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress wrote:
> For those of you who have recently asked about current OASIS drafts of SRU 
> (2.0) and CQL ...
>
> The *official* versions reside at OASIS, but because of confusing (and 
> sometimes inaccessible) links, as well as uncertainty about  status 
> (because of imbedded dates),  we now maintain *unofficial copies* of the 
> most current versions at:
>
> http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/oasis/current/sru-2-0.doc
> http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/oasis/current/cql.doc
>
> We will continue to maintain copies of the most current version at these 
> URLs.
>
> --Ray
>
>