On 4 May 2010 13:19, Ross Singer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Having read the rest of this thread, I find that nothing that's been
>> said changes my initial gut reaction on reading this question: DO NOT
>> USE DCTERMS. It's vocabulary is Just Plain Inadequate, and not only
>> for esoteric cases like the Alternative Chronological Designation of
>> First Issue or Part of Sequence field that Karen mentioned. Despite
>> having 70 (seventy!) elements, it's lacking fundamental fields for
>> describing articles in journals -- there are no journalTitle, volume,
>> issue, startPage or endPage fields. That, for me, is a deal-breaker.
>
> If you're using Dublin Core as XML, I agree with this. If you're
> using Dublin Core as RDF (which is, honestly, the only thing it's
> really good for), this is a non-issue.
Oh, what is the solution when using it in RDF?
|
