Not very interested as a cataloging source. Not interested in OCLC
either as far as that goes. I might be interested in getting our records
there so they are available to others for ILL, beyond that not so much.
I do a lot of original cataloging. Neither service would help with that.

However, if they provide NACO support, than it might be worth joining.
We can't afford OCLC, yet we have the connection to the authors in our
field to contribute to NACO. It is frustrating. If there was a low cost
alternative to the OCLC membership requirement for NACO we would be very
interested.

Sincerely,
David Bigwood
[log in to unmask]
http://twitter.com/LPI_Library
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lunarandplanetaryinstitute/


-----Original Message-----
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Jill Ellern
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 2:12 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [CODE4LIB] Skyriver discussions?

Thought I'd ask this group the same question I've asked my UNC system
librarians...

I spent some time since the IUG conference talking with my library
director and head of cataloging about it and was wondering what the
interest is in it or discussion about it have been going on at the other
libraries...

Jill