d'oh, s/dcterms:related/dcterms:relation/ (thanks ksclarke). I also
meant to point out that rdfs:seeAlso is another option.
//Ed
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Ed Summers <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Jonathan Rochkind <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> So "dc:relation" does sound like the right vocabulary element for generic
>> "related web page page", thanks. Is the value of dc:relation _neccesarily_
>> a URI/URL? I hope so, because otherwise I'm not sure dc:relation is
>> sufficient, as I really do need something that says "some related URL".
>
> As Ross pointed out you probably should use dcterms:related if you
> want to be more explicit about the range being a URI. If you happen to
> want to serialize these links in Atom you could layer these
> dcterms:related assertions pretty easily:
>
> <feed>
> ...
> <entry>
> <id>https://blacklight.mse.jhu.edu/demo/catalog/bib_391129</id>
> <title>The Journal of physiology</title>
> <updated>2010-07-08T11:26:10Z</updated>
> <link href="https://blacklight.mse.jhu.edu/demo/catalog/bib_391129"
> rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
> <link href="http://jp.physoc.org/"
> rel="http://purl.org/dcterms/related" type="text/html" />
> ...
> <summary type="html">...</summary>
> </entry>
> </feed>
>
> //Ed
>
|