Ross Singer wrote:
> Unlike Twitter, however, we're starting from nothing.  There's nothing
> currently invested in ILS-DI clients that would break by committing
> solely to OAuth (or anything, for that matter).

Are you sure there's nothing currently invested?  I thought the Koha
community was already implementing ILS-DI so I assume there's some
client using it, as people don't tend to fund useless developments.  I
don't remember if any of the co-op's client libraries are using it
yet, though.

[ILS-DI]
> It's no longer under the auspices of the DLF and the priority of
> functionality has changed. [...]

OK, if it's no longer under the auspices of the DLF are you still
in contact with BibLibre?

> Indeed, and I hope the reply was likewise helpful.

It was.  More answers than questions, which is always good!

That said, I'm still not seeing the benefits of OAuth for ILS-DI
compared to existing HTTP authentication and authorization methods,
really.

Regards,
-- 
MJ Ray (slef), member of www.software.coop, a for-more-than-profit co-op.
Past Koha Release Manager (2.0), LMS programmer, statistician, webmaster.
In My Opinion Only: see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html
Available for hire for Koha work http://www.software.coop/products/koha