Ralph, Owen's pointing to a list where corporate (110) and geographic names
(151) are mixed.

Thanks Owen, I haven't seen that the first time. I guess you got that mixed
110/151 when limiting to 'exact name'. Perhaps Andrew has a workaround.

*Ya'aqov*





On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:34 AM, LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> If you look at the fields those names come from, I think they mean
> England as a corporation, not England as a place.
>
> Ralph
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
> Of
> > Owen Stephens
> > Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 11:28 AM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] LCSH and Linked Data
> >
> > Still digesting Andrew's response (thanks Andrew), but
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Ya'aqov Ziso <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > *Currently under id.loc.gov you will not find name authority
> records, but
> > > you can find them at viaf.org*.
> > > *[YZ]*  viaf.org does not include geographic names. I just checked
> there
> > > England.
> > >
> >
> > Is this not the relevant VIAF entry
> > http://viaf.org/viaf/14299580<http://viaf.org/viaf/142995804>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Owen Stephens
> > Owen Stephens Consulting
> > Web: http://www.ostephens.com
> > Email: [log in to unmask]
>



-- 
*ya'aqov**ZISO | **[log in to unmask] **| 856 217 3456

*