That's right. I see that Google didn't provide a -1 button on their +1
Cindy Harper, Systems Librarian
Colgate University Libraries
[log in to unmask]
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Peter Noerr <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Just curious: - what do you mean by " Some way to avoid the site-scrapers
> who populate the troubleshooting
> > pages." (last sentence below)?
> I presume you are wishing to avoid the "trouble shooting" sites which
> consist of nothing more than pages copied from other sites, and look only at
> the prime source pages for information?
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> Cindy Harper
> > Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 2:15 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: [CODE4LIB] Group-sourced Google custom search site?
> > That reminds me - I was looking last week into the possibility of making
> > Google custom search site with either a whitelist of trusted technology
> > sites, or a blacklist of sites to exclude. I haven't looked into whether
> > the management of that could be group-sourced, but maybe someone else
> > has thought about this. I haven't looked into the terms of service of
> > custom search sites, either. But of course slashdot was high on the
> > whitelist. I was thinking about sites for several purposes - general
> > technology news and opinion, or specific troubleshooting / programming
> > sites. Some way to avoid the site-scrapers who populate the
> > pages.
> > Cindy Harper, Colgate U.