> I think Roy's question was fair given the ambiguity of the words
> used and had it truly meant to "develop" (as from the ground up)
> it could have served as a good conversation starting point about
> how to determine the need and merits of starting another major
> project with what appeared to be very limited resources. 
> Especially when there are many tools readily available from other
> sources/projects.
> 
> But the clarification has been issued and the response that new
> wording is likely to be used in subsequent communications.
> 
> Let's accept that and move on.

I concur. Let's accept that and move on.

-- 
Eric Lease Morgan